ThePrint ThePrintPod: WHY DID BELGIAN COURT REJECT MEHUL CHOKSI's PLEA AGAINST EXTRADITION?
Oct 23, 2025
A Belgian court has rejected Mihul Choksi's extradition appeal, citing insufficient evidence of an unfair trial risk. The judge dismissed claims of kidnapping and political bias, emphasizing that Choksi’s supporting documents lacked relevance. Facing significant charges in India linked to a massive bank fraud case, Choksi has been unable to prove risks of torture or inhumane treatment. The court found the Indian warrants enforceable, ratifying the legitimacy of the case against him.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Court Sees No Evidence Of Unfair Trial
- The Belgian court found no convincing proof that Indian judges lack independence or that Mihul Choksi would receive an unfair trial in India.
- It rejected Choksi's claims about kidnapping and trial unfairness as unsupported by his submitted documents.
Act Quickly If You Plan To Appeal
- Choksi can still appeal the decision to the Belgian Supreme Court within 15 days.
- Take immediate legal steps if pursuing further challenges to extradition.
Choksi’s Detention In Antwerp
- Mihul Choksi, former promoter of Gitanjali Gems, was detained in Antwerp on India's request on April 11.
- The 65-year-old has been lodged in a Belgian prison since his arrest.