In this engaging discussion, A.O. Scott, a seasoned film critic for The New York Times Book Review, shares insights from his 23-year career reviewing films and transitioning back to literary criticism. He delves into the nostalgic relationship between personal branding and memory, contrasting the artistic and commercial motivations in filmmaking. Scott explores the evolution of film criticism in the digital age and highlights how societal changes influence our appreciation of cinema. With humor and wisdom, he reflects on generational perspectives and the dynamics of creativity in modern storytelling.
The podcast underscores the importance of evolving cultural symbols, illustrated by Akilah Hughes' initiative to replace a racist school mascot with something more inclusive like biscuits.
A comprehensive view of mental health is essential, as it intertwines biological factors with the cultural and societal conditions impacting personal well-being and stigma.
The evolution of film criticism is highlighted, showcasing how the role has shifted to include diverse perspectives amidst the overwhelming content landscape of streaming platforms.
Deep dives
Changing Cultural Symbols
The podcast discusses the need for cultural symbols to evolve and how Akilah Hughes wants her high school in Kentucky to change its racist mascot, the Rebels, to something more universally accepted like biscuits. This approach highlights the importance of addressing historical injustices associated with symbols and the idea that certain traditions may no longer be relevant. By opting for biscuits—a beloved Southern food—Hughes aims to foster a more inclusive environment within the school community. This shift in symbolism emphasizes the need for ongoing dialogue about race and representation in society.
Mental Health and Societal Influence
The podcast explores the complexities of mental health, emphasizing that it is shaped not only by biological factors but also by cultural and societal conditions. This perspective invites listeners to consider how their environment impacts mental well-being and the common struggles that many face in navigating mental health challenges. The discussion also includes the stigma often attached to mental illness, which can complicate personal experiences and societal understanding. By examining these influences, the podcast encourages a more comprehensive view of mental health care.
Critiquing Cinema's Evolution
The conversation addresses the evolution of film criticism and its impact on the relationship between critics and audiences. The guest reflects on how the role of a film critic has changed over the years, noting the shift from traditional reviews to contemporary discussions that include diverse perspectives. The discussion suggests that the flood of content from streaming platforms can overwhelm critics and audiences alike, making it harder to appreciate cinema as an art form. This operating environment affects the reception of films and the nature of critical engagement.
Film as Art and Audience Engagement
The podcast emphasizes the importance of emotional engagement with film, highlighting that movies provoke unique, personal reactions that transcend technical analysis. Critics often focus on the experience of viewing a film, acknowledging that various elements contribute to its emotional impact. This approach draws attention to the idea that a film’s significance may not always lie in its production techniques, but rather in what it evokes in the audience. Ultimately, the discussion suggests that art's value is measured by its ability to resonate personally with individuals.
Navigating Changing Tastes
The dialogue discourages the notion of rigid definitions of art and champions the idea that tastes evolve over time, both personally and culturally. The discussion includes how the aging process can influence one’s appreciation of art forms, drawing parallels between evolving perspectives on music and film. Recognizing that individuals may react differently to the same work at various stages in life encourages deeper understanding and better discourse around creative expression. By acknowledging this evolution, the conversation fosters a more forgiving environment for both creators and audiences as they navigate the complexities of art.
Meet A.O. Scott, a critic at large for The New York Times Book Review. In the mid-90s, he abandoned academia for journalism, writing mostly about books for The Nation, The New York Review of Books, Newsday, Slate and The New York Times, which hired him as a film critic at the beginning of 2000. A.O. Scott spent more than 23 years in that job, reviewing thousands of movies, attending film festivals, making Oscar predictions and interviewing the likes of Robert De Niro, Jennifer Lopez and the Coen Brothers. in 2023 he joined the Book Review — a homecoming of sorts, and also a new adventure. Like every other journalist at the Times, He's committed to upholding the standards outlined in Ethical Journalism Handbook. EnJOY!