

Should AGI Really Be the Goal of Artificial Intelligence Research?
40 snips Mar 9, 2025
Eryk Salvaggio, a visiting professor and tech policy expert, along with AI ethicist Borhane Blili-Hamelin and Margaret Mitchell, chief ethics scientist at Hugging Face, dive into the controversial pursuit of artificial general intelligence (AGI). They question whether AGI should remain the ultimate goal, arguing it may detract from vital ethical discussions and genuine societal benefits. The conversation highlights the danger of mainstream consensus around AGI, advocating for diverse perspectives and practical applications in AI that genuinely address community needs.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
AGI as Narrative
- The term "AGI" lacks concrete meaning but serves as a narrative for prioritizing interests.
- Powerful figures use "AGI" to advance their agendas, giving a positive spin to technological advancements.
AGI's Vagueness
- AGI's vagueness allows various outcomes to be labeled as progress, fostering a form of faith in the AI industry.
- This faith often overshadows material needs and social concerns and replaces real political deliberation.
Intelligence and Disagreements
- "Intelligence" is value-laden, encompassing desirable and observable aspects, leading to disagreements about what's important.
- AGI discussions often skip these disagreements, masking underlying priorities in AI research.