COP28 is a pivotal moment for carbon markets: can countries move forward on Article 6?
Nov 15, 2023
auto_awesome
The podcast explores the complexities of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and its implications for carbon markets. It discusses the challenges and debates surrounding Article 6.4, the pricing of carbon offsets, the current status of Article 6.2, and outstanding issues in the carbon market.
COP28 in Dubai will focus on operationalizing a global carbon market, particularly Article 6, which enables international cooperation to achieve emission reduction targets.
Challenges remain in Article 6.4, including methodological guidance, liability for reversals, transformative activities, baseline contraction factors, and the transition of CDM credits.
Deep dives
Implications of COP28 for Future Carbon Markets
COP28 in Dubai, UAE, will focus on the operationalization of a global carbon market, particularly Article 6, which enables countries to cooperate to achieve emission reduction targets. Article 6.2 allows bilateral agreements between nations, facilitating the cross-border trading of credits. Several countries like Japan, Singapore, and Switzerland are actively involved in these agreements. Article 6.4 will replace the clean development mechanism and require approval from the host country and a supervisory board before generating and trading credits. However, challenges remain, including methodological guidance, liability for reversals, transformative activities, baseline contraction factors, and the transition of CDM credits. Negotiations on Article 6.4 are ongoing, and the voluntary carbon market awaits its outcomes, as it could significantly impact project viability, demand, and supply.
Progress and Issues with Article 6.4
Article 6.4, the mechanism for a global carbon market, faces issues in methodologies, carbon removals, reversals liability, transformative activity exemptions, and CDM credit transition. These factors have hampered agreement on guidelines and slowed progress. The corresponding adjustment premium is expected to increase the prices of Article 6.4 credits compared to the voluntary carbon market. Lack of transparency, absence of neutral oversight bodies, and varying country resources raise concerns about quality and integrity in bilateral agreements. The involvement of election cycles and potential chaos in revoking decisions further complicates matters. Streamlined guidelines, expert involvement, and neutral oversight are needed to address these challenges.
Article 6.2 and its Status
Article 6.2, which allows countries to trade internationally transferred mitigation outcomes, is seen as largely operational. Countries like Switzerland, South Korea, and Singapore have engaged in bilateral agreements, trading credits under this mechanism. However, challenges exist, such as transparency issues, inadequate incentives for stringency, and varying resources among countries. Lack of information and grasp on pricing negotiations also hinders progress, particularly for countries new to the market. Further development, expert involvement, and addressing these challenges are necessary to ensure the effectiveness and integrity of Article 6.2.
Article 6 of the Paris Agreement is seen as an essential enabler of international emissions trading, providing countries and businesses with a key pathway to meet and accelerate their climate goals.
However, many key decisions and rules around the use of Article 6.2 and Article 6.4 need to be clarified at the COP28 climate summit in Dubai in order to move carbon markets forward.
S&P Global Commodity Insights' experts Dana Agrotti, Vandana Sebastian and Eklavya Gupte explore some of the complexities of Article 6 and its implications for both the compliance and voluntary carbon markets.