
 Nullius in Verba
 Nullius in Verba Episode 47: Inductio et Deductio
 27 snips 
 Nov 15, 2024  Explore the fascinating world of induction and deduction in scientific inquiry. Discover how philosophical perspectives shape our understanding of these methods. Delve into the complexities of generalizing findings and the pitfalls of statistical inference. Learn about the critical role of conscientiousness in psychological theories and the importance of precise variable definitions. Navigate the intricacies of aligning statistical models with hypotheses and the historical figures like Bacon and Popper who shaped these reasoning processes. It's a compelling dialogue on the essence of scientific methodology! 
 AI Snips 
 Chapters 
 Books 
 Transcript 
 Episode notes 
Bacon's True Induction
- Francis Bacon distinguished between two types of induction: a flawed, hasty generalization from particulars and a "true," gradual ascent to axioms.
- He believed the latter, genuine induction, was the correct scientific method.
Induction vs. Deduction
- Induction involves generalizing from specific observations to broader understandings, while deduction derives specific predictions from general rules.
- Both Daniel Larkins and Smriti Mehta define these concepts.
Hypothetical-Deductive Model
- The hypothetical-deductive model, often contrasted with Bacon's induction, involves hypothesizing, deducing predictions, and empirically testing them.
- Daniel and Smriti discuss this model.





