Bulwark Takes BREAKING: Comey Indictment DISMISSED, Halligan Appointment “Invalid” (w/ Kyle Cheney)
Nov 24, 2025
In this lively discussion, Kyle Cheney, a seasoned POLITICO reporter, breaks down the recent dismissal of indictments against James Comey. He details how the court invalidated Lindsay Halligan's appointment, affecting subsequent legal actions. The conversation dives into the implications of this ruling on current and future prosecutions, exploring DOJ strategies and potential workarounds. They also examine the broader impact on politically charged investigations and criticize the prosecution's handling, all while speculating on the political fallout. A must-listen for legal and political enthusiasts!
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Appointment Flaw Voids Prosecution
- The judge ruled Lindsay Halligan's appointment invalid because the AG exceeded appointment authority after the 120-day interim limit expired.
- That ruling effectively rewound the case to pre-indictment and voided subsequent actions tied to her role.
Inexperience Produced Procedural Weaknesses
- Halligan's lack of prosecutorial experience produced procedural errors and awkward grand jury handling that weakened the case.
- Those errors might have sunk the indictment regardless of the appointment issue.
Career Staff Withheld Support
- Career prosecutors had reservations about the merits and did not sign on to Halligan's grand jury work.
- That absence of career endorsement undermines the prosecution's credibility and durability.