Swinburne vs. Dawkins on the Mystery of Existence Part Two

Debate continues on whether a scientifically minded person would believe in God as the ultimate cause. They discuss the misconception about simplicity as the sole criterion for evaluating theory. Swinburne argues that objects with partial understanding in science can be an analogy for the existence of God. The debate explores whether God's simplicity is compatible with His ability to read billions of people's thoughts at the same time.