The hosts dive into the chaotic energy of the Trump rally in NYC and Kamala Harris's closing arguments. They reflect on their critical yet supportive stance towards the Harris/Walz campaign despite its flaws. The conversation explores the intertwining of sports culture and political affiliations, while expressing concerns about voter dynamics. Disillusionment with candidates and the need for authentic representation within the Democratic Party take center stage. They even tease an interactive election watch party for their audience!
The podcast discusses how sports fandom, particularly between Eagles and Steelers fans, reflects broader political affiliations in Pennsylvania.
Participants express a mix of anxiety and cautious optimism regarding the upcoming election outcome, highlighting the Democrats' ground game.
Concerns arise over the media's role in elections, particularly their failure to endorse candidates, and its impact on public trust.
Deep dives
Eagles vs. Steelers: A Political Divide
The discussion highlights the cultural and political divide between Eagles and Steelers fans in Pennsylvania. It suggests that the fan bases mirror the political affiliations of the region, with Eagles fans leaning more towards liberal ideologies while Steelers fans are associated with conservative views. The conversation illustrates how sports fandom can reflect broader social and political dynamics, indicating that the loyalties within the NFL can even influence voting behavior in local elections. It presents a light-hearted yet insightful analysis of how cultural identifiers can intertwine with political identities in Pennsylvania.
Election Anxiety and Optimism
The participants express their mixed feelings about the upcoming election, revealing a sense of uncertainty about the expected outcomes. While one speaker acknowledges the disorganization within the opposition party, he highlights a more robust ground game for the Democratic candidate, leading to a cautious sense of optimism regarding her potential victory. They note that local political experts seem hopeful, despite concerns about the overall campaign structure. This conversation encapsulates a blend of anxiety and hope as the election date approaches, reflecting the heightened emotional stakes for voters.
Trump's Acceptance of Election Results
The potential situation of Trump losing the election and his possible refusal to accept the results is considered. One speaker asserts that Trump is unlikely to concede, predicting that his reaction would involve claiming the election was stolen, which could incite unrest. There is skepticism regarding the likelihood of a civil war stemming from electoral disputes, but concerns arise about possible violence akin to past incidents, such as January 6th. This discussion reveals fears about the implications of contentious electoral outcomes on American democracy and societal stability.
The Media and Political Endorsements
The conversation shifts to the role of legacy media in the election, particularly regarding their decision not to endorse a presidential candidate. This decision by prominent newspapers leads to public outcry, resulting in significant subscription cancellations. The speakers argue that while media endorsements might not sway voter behavior, there is a journalistic responsibility to take a stand during critical elections. They contend that when media owners prioritize corporate interests over journalistic integrity, it undermines public trust and ultimately harms democratic processes.
Campaign Messaging and Voter Motivation
As the election nears, there is concern over the ineffectiveness of the Democrats' campaign messaging, particularly focusing on democracy versus fascism. The speakers argue that such framing fails to resonate with voters seeking substantive policy discussions and can alienate critical demographic groups. They note the importance of offering actionable solutions rather than relying on fear tactics. This critique underscores the necessity for political campaigns to engage with voters' real concerns rather than relying on a narrative of fear to drive voter turnout.
We talk about the Trump rally in New York City, Kamala’s closing statements and why, despite months of criticizing the Harris/Walz campaign and living in deep blue states, we both ended up voting for it. We also try to tee up what the next four years might look like for the Democrats whether Harris wins or loses.
As always, this show is funded by subscriptions. We give everything away for free and don’t have any paywalls but we do rely on your generosity to keep the lights on and the Zyn stocked. If you could reach over and just hit that subscribe button, it helps us bring you these takes.
Thank you!
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit goodbye.substack.com/subscribe
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
