Making the Argument with Nick Freitas Has the Left Captured Our Military?
Dec 9, 2025
Davis Yountz, an attorney representing service members, delves into the contentious case of Dan Abbott, a Virginia National Guard member expelled amid claims of a Left-wing purge. They discuss the problematic military administrative separation processes and the legal arguments surrounding the Pentagon's authority. Davis highlights the bias and vague accusations presented during Dan's board hearing, while both reflect on the concerns of ideological indoctrination within military training. They also outline ways for supporters to help contest Dan's separation.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
From Local Militia Member To National Competitor
- Dan Abbott joined a locally recognized Campbell County militia after 2020 and served in the Virginia National Guard without issue for years.
- He later won Soldier/Best Warrior competitions and placed third nationally before the separation action arose.
Cleared Once, Penalized Later
- The Virginia National Guard previously investigated Dan and cleared him, including conversations with senior leaders like Brig. Gen. Gallagher.
- That clearance later conflicted with a new TAG opinion that declared the same militia membership unlawful.
Hypothetical Conflicts Used As Justification
- The TAG asserted authority to bar Guard members from dual membership based on hypothetical mission conflicts without citing statutory or constitutional law.
- Counsel for Dan produced an 18+ page legal rebuttal, and the Guard responded only that they were "confident" the order was lawful.