Intelligence Squared Debate: Big Tech was Right to Deplatform Trump
Feb 19, 2021
In this captivating discussion, Shola Mos-Shogbamimu, a political and women's rights activist, Nadine Strossen, a civil liberties champion and former ACLU president, and James Bosworth, a political risk expert, tackle the explosive topic of Big Tech's decision to deplatform Donald Trump. They explore the fine line between censorship and accountability, the implications for free speech in a digital age, and the potential risks to democracy posed by such actions. Their diverse viewpoints ignite a thought-provoking debate about the responsibilities of social media in shaping public discourse.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Trump's Social Media Privilege
- Donald Trump's use of social media, particularly Twitter, was problematic due to his divisive rhetoric and spread of disinformation.
- Social media companies initially turned a blind eye to his behavior due to his presidential status, granting him privileges not afforded to ordinary users.
Tech Giants' Unchecked Power
- Deplatforming Trump sets a dangerous precedent, empowering tech giants like Zuckerberg and Dorsey with unchecked control over public discourse.
- This unchecked power poses a greater threat to democracy than Trump's actions, as it bypasses constitutional and political checks.
Deplatforming as Crime Prevention
- Donald Trump's deplatforming was not an act of censorship but a response to criminal activity, specifically inciting violence.
- Tech platforms have a responsibility to prevent crimes, especially those involving violence, regardless of the perpetrator's political status.
