Cat-Eating, Rally Sizes, and Post-Birth Abortion: An American Debate

11 snips

Sep 11, 2024

Guest

David Faris

Batya Ungar-Sargon, an insightful political commentator, joins David Faris, an astute political analyst, and Peter Savodnik, a keen observer of current events. They dissect the recent chaotic presidential debate where Trump bizarrely claimed immigrants are stealing and eating pets, leading to a fact-checking moment. The discussion dives into the candidates' contrasting performances, their appeal to voters, and the absurdity of the claims that emerged. Insights into the evolving political landscape and the impact of debates on voter sentiment add depth to the conversation.

Ask episode

AI Snips

Chapters

Transcript

Episode notes

ANECDOTE

Trump's Cat-Eating Claim

Kamala Harris baited Trump about his campaign rallies, leading him into a rant about immigrants.
Trump claimed immigrants were crossing the border, settling in Ohio, and eating pets, a claim fact-checked by the moderator.

INSIGHT

Trump's Unfiltered Nature

Batya Ungar-Sargon argued Trump's unfiltered personality, while detrimental to his debate performance, is what allowed him to challenge establishments and achieve successes during his first term.
Conversely, Harris's polished performance reflects her alignment with the Democratic establishment.

INSIGHT

Trump's Missed Opportunities

David Farris believes Trump's debate performance may alienate swing voters due to his focus on provocative topics and inability to articulate clear policy positions.
Trump missed opportunities to connect with undecided voters on key issues.

Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode

Get the app

Last night was the much-anticipated presidential debate between incumbent vice president Kamala Harris and former president Donald Trump. There was no live audience, but the bashing and accusations, one against the other, were all the same.

Trump called Kamala a Marxist. Kamala called Trump a liar. Kamala said Trump is for America’s wealthiest. Trump said Kamala is for killing babies at term. Trump said Kamala “wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens in prison.” And Kamala said Trump is simply a disgrace.

Of course, they went head-to-head on the normal issues: the economy, tariffs, abortion, China, fracking, policing in America, January 6, foreign policy, and—eating cats!? Not so normal.

If you didn’t watch the debate, if you’re not on social media, or if you didn’t receive memes from your family group chat, let me explain. First, Kamala baited Trump on a question about his campaign rallies.

It got under his skin. He fell for it. Which then led him into a long rant about immigrants, which brings us back to the cat thing. Because in his words, immigrants are crossing the border, settling in Ohio, and stealing—and eating—our pets.

The moderator fact-checked him: “We have talked to the city manager of Springfield, and there are no credible reports of pets being taken and eaten.” To which Trump responded: “But I saw it on television!”

All Kamala needed to do was stand there and smile. As the debate went on, Trump reaffirmed that he thinks he won the 2020 election; He doubled down on the idea that doctors are executing babies after they’re born; and he referred to the January 6 rioters as “we.” He also quoted Hungarian autocrat Viktor Orbán. And again, all Kamala needed to do was stand there and keep smiling.

So what does it all mean? What impact will it have? Will independent voters, or swing-state voters, change their mind based on Kamala and Trump’s performance? Did Kamala clarify her policy positions and provide the substance that voters want to hear from her other than “joy” and “vibes”? Did the muted mics limit Trump’s abrasive demeanor? And most importantly, who won the debate? The answer seems pretty clear.

To discuss all this and more is Free Press contributor and opinion editor at Newsweek, Batya Ungar-Sargon; contributing writer at The Week, Newsweek, and Slate, David Faris; and Free Press writer and editor Peter Savodnik.

If you liked what you heard from Honestly, the best way to support us is to go to TheFP.com and become a Free Press subscriber today.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices