The podcast discusses the different approaches of European and American oil majors towards renewable energy, influenced by regional energy policy and perceptions of fossil fuel longevity. It explores the diversification of the oil industry, the strategic advantage of oil companies in the energy transition, investor strategies, the impact of the Inflation Reduction Act, and the future of renewable energy investments.
European oil majors like BP and Shell emphasize renewable energy, while American oil majors focus on extending their fossil fuel businesses.
Political dynamics and ownership structure shape oil companies' clean energy strategies and their focus on renewable, carbon capture, and low-carbon solutions.
Deep dives
Shift in Oil Company Strategies
There has been a divergence in the approaches of major oil companies toward the energy transition. European oil majors like BP and Shell have emphasized renewable energy and built wind and solar power businesses, while American oil majors like ExxonMobil and Chevron have focused on extending their fossil fuel businesses with less emphasis on alternatives.
Influence of Political Dynamics and Ownership Structure
Political dynamics and ownership structure play a significant role in shaping the clean energy strategies of oil companies. European independent oil companies envision themselves as potential green supergiants in the future due to their size, financial strength, and experience with large infrastructure projects. They invest in renewables, carbon capture, and low-carbon solutions. On the other hand, American oil majors perceive their competitive advantage to lie in oil and gas production and focus more on biofuels, carbon capture, and hydrogen. European companies face more regulation, litigation, and pressure from investors compared to their American counterparts.
Investor Pressure and Future Predictions
Investor pressure has a substantial influence on oil companies' climate strategies. Shareholders are divided in their preferences, with some pushing for greener portfolios and others favoring the status quo. The difference in approaches can be attributed to varying expectations of future climate policies and market conditions. The profitability of fossil fuel companies may be temporary, and governments are expected to tighten regulations in the long run. Factors like government policy, investor perspectives, and anticipated climate risks will shape the direction of oil companies in the energy transition.
A Penn economist explores the relationship between regional energy policy and oil company support for renewable power. ---
In recent years there has been a divergence in the trajectories of the world’s major oil companies. The shift has been most noticeable in the case of the European oil majors, including companies such as BP and Shell, which during the past decade began to emphasize the importance of renewable energy to their futures, and subsequently built major wind and solar power businesses. American oil majors have, by contrast, generally taken a more defensive approach to the energy transition. In public statements, companies such as ExxonMobil and Chevron have emphasized that their competitive advantage lies solidly in oil and gas production.
What comes into focus when considering the directions of these and other oil companies is that their core approach to the energy transition may be influenced by political dynamics in the regions they call home and, ultimately, in their estimates of the staying power of fossil fuels.
Arthur van Benthem, an associate professor at the Wharton School of Business, discusses the relationship between regional energy policy and the clean energy strategies of major independent and state-owned oil companies. His recent research explores the pressure that oil companies face from policymakers and financial markets to reduce their climate impacts.
Arthur van Benthem is an associate professor of business economics and public policy at the Wharton School of Business.
Energy Policy Now is produced by The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. For all things energy policy, visit kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu