Political reporter Jake Lahut discusses the controversy surrounding The Apprentice movie, financed by Dan Snyder, facing legal obstacles for a US release. The film portrays Donald Trump's rise to power in the 70s and 80s amidst censorship challenges and potential veto power concerns.
The movie's controversial depiction of Trump's early years evokes concerns about its cultural and political impact.
Distribution challenges in the US for The Apprentice stem from objections related to Trump and financial hurdles.
Deep dives
Movie Plot Features Donald Trump's Rise to Power
The Apprentice, a biopic about Donald Trump, portrays him as an apprentice learning power dynamics with Roy Cohn's influence. The movie depicts Trump's tactics in 1970s and 1980s New York, emphasizing lying and manipulative strategies. The Cannes Film Festival screening generated controversy due to graphic scenes, including a rape scene involving Trump and his ex-wife. The film's portrayal of Trump's moral code and power acquisition leaves a lasting impact on viewers.
Distribution Challenges for The Apprentice
Despite a positive reception at Cannes, The Apprentice faces distribution challenges in the US due to objections from figures associated with Trump. Dan Snyder's financial stake in the production company poses a hurdle for securing a US distribution deal. The filmmakers' transparency regarding fictional elements in the movie, including controversial scenes, adds complexity to its reception and potential distribution.
Political and Cultural Implications of The Apprentice
The Apprentice's potential release sparks fears within Hollywood and Trump's circle regarding its cultural and political impact. The movie's depiction of Trump's early years evokes concerns among political operatives and industry professionals alike. The clash between downplaying the movie's significance and recognizing its potential to influence the 2024 election highlights the complex interplay between culture, politics, and public perception.
The Apprentice, starring Captain America’s Sebastian Stan and Succession’s Jeremy Strong,was financed in part by the widely-loathed former-Washington Commanders owner Dan Snyder. But after the movie premiered at the Cannes Film Festival, Trump’s attorneys sent cease-and-desist letters to the filmmakers—and Snyder seems to be using veto power on an American sale of the rights. Will this controversial cut of the film ever play on the big screen in the States?
Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.