Jenny Matheny – The Violence of Judges and Ruth’s Response
Nov 10, 2023
auto_awesome
Jenny Matheny, researcher, discusses the violence against women in Judges and Ruth's response. They explore intentional gaps in the text, linguistic connections, and implications for addressing gendered violence. They also have lighthearted conversations about clothing preferences and a humorous story involving nail polish.
The story of the rape and dismemberment in Judges highlights gendered violence and the need for a new path forward.
The book of Ruth offers an alternative response to the crisis of lineage in Judges and challenges common assumptions about gendered violence.
Deep dives
The horror of gendered violence in Judges 19-21 and its connection to Ruth
The story of the rape and dismemberment of the concubine in Judges 19-21 is a horrific example of gendered violence and highlights the silence and gaps within the text. The use of the Hebrew verb 'to cut' in these chapters further emphasizes the violent nature of the story and its connection to sacrificial practices. In contrast, the book of Ruth offers an alternative voice and response to the crisis of lineage presented in Judges, exhibiting acts of courage and risk-taking. The repeated refrain in Judges that there was no king in Israel and everyone did what was right in their own eyes serves as a backdrop to the disintegration of leadership and the need for a new path forward, which Ruth provides with her story of faithfulness and the birth of a new lineage.
The significance of genre and intertextuality in Judges 19-21 and Ruth
The recognition of the Michelle genre in Judges 19-21 and its connection to Ruth sheds light on the didactic nature of these texts. The gaps and silences in Judges invite the reader to engage more deeply with the story and consider the ironic elements within. Ruth, as a response in the form of a festival scroll, offers a different perspective and establishes connections between violent stories and the need for ethical responses. The repeated phrase 'there was no king in Israel' in Judges underscores the disintegration of leadership and creates a space for Ruth to provide an alternative vision and a response to the crisis of lineage.
Challenging gendered violence through a careful reading of the biblical text
The study of Judges 19-21 and Ruth opens up discussions about gendered violence and offers an opportunity to challenge common assumptions. By focusing on the horror of the story in Judges and its connection to sacrificial practices, readers are encouraged to confront the gendered violence depicted in the text and consider the implications for their own understanding of this issue. The story of Ruth, with its themes of courage and risk-taking, provides a counter-narrative and invites readers to explore alternative responses to violence. This careful reading of the biblical text encourages readers to navigate difficult texts and engage in discussions about gendered violence with a fresh perspective.
Implications for understanding the role of leadership and the search for answers
The depiction of a lack of king in Israel in Judges and the subsequent narrative of Ruth offers insights into the role of leadership and the search for solutions. The repeated refrain in Judges highlights the failure of leadership and the need for a new path forward. Ruth, with its focus on Ruth's actions and her role in the Davidic lineage, presents an alternative response to the crisis of leadership in Israel. The connection between the violence in Judges and the contrasting narrative in Ruth invites readers to reconsider their understanding of leadership and offers a glimpse into new possibilities and answers for the community.
Episode: What happens if you read Ruth and Judges together? What might Ruth say to the violence against women in Judges? Jenny Matheny discusses these questions and more (like how not […]