The Daily Blast: Jamie Raskin’s Brutal Takedown of Elon Musk Shows Dems Are Waking Up
Feb 5, 2025
auto_awesome
Andy Craig, an election law expert and fellow at the Institute for Humane Studies, dives into the urgent concerns over Elon Musk's influence on government operations. He discusses Representative Jamie Raskin's bold challenge to Musk regarding financial disclosures and conflict-of-interest rules. Craig highlights the alarming lack of accountability and ethical governance associated with Musk's role. He emphasizes the importance of public resistance against such power grabs and how lawmakers can effectively advocate for transparency and uphold constitutional principles.
Representative Jamie Raskin's challenge to Elon Musk underscores the urgent need for transparency and accountability in government dealings with influential private sector figures.
Public resistance, including legal challenges and increased awareness, is crucial for safeguarding constitutional governance and preventing unchecked power in government operations.
Deep dives
Elon Musk's Role as a Special Government Employee
Elon Musk has been designated as a special government employee (SGE) in a newly created position within the federal government. This status allows him to act as an outside consultant without the full financial disclosure requirements that regular federal employees must adhere to, raising concerns about lack of transparency. Although SGEs are typically expected to play an advisory role, Musk seems to be exerting significant control over executive branch decisions, including involvement with the Treasury Department's payment systems and actions that could dissolve agencies like USAID. This delineation between his official title and the level of authority he appears to wield has sparked debate about the legality of his actions and the implications for government oversight.
Implications of Musk's Actions on Constitutional Governance
The unprecedented authority that Musk is assumed to have raised alarms about the respect for constitutional governance in the U.S. According to Representative Jamie Raskin, the notion that Musk can control significant aspects of government operations without any formal election or appointment undermines the established power structures. Raskin emphasizes that the Congress alone holds power over the nation’s finances, challenging the legitimacy of Musk's role and the potential consequences of this apparent power grab. The situation reflects broader concerns about the erosion of legal norms and accountability in government operations, especially in the context of private sector influence.
Public Resistance and Legal Challenges Ahead
There is a growing public outcry against the actions being taken by Musk and his associates, suggesting that citizens are increasingly demanding accountability from their government. Legal challenges are being pursued regarding the potential unconstitutional actions being taken at agencies like the Treasury and USAID, with advocates stressing the need for courts to affirm constitutional protections. Experts see room for optimism in the legal landscape, as some cases involving federal rights and agency reforms have already seen favorable rulings. This potential for legal pushback highlights the importance of public awareness and mobilization against overreach, as well as the ongoing need for transparency in government dealings.
As Elon Musk’s government takeover continues, Representative Jamie Raskin has been sounding a particularly urgent alarm. And during a Twitter fight between the two, Raskin asked Musk a simple question: As someone who supposedly works for the government now, will he submit to basic financial disclosure and conflict-of-interest rules? This got us thinking: Why are we treating the idea that Musk should submit to these rules as a fool’s errand? Let’s demand it! We talked to election law expert Andy Craig, a fellow at the Institute for Humane Studies and author of a new piece for The Unpopulist on Musk’s power grabs. He explains how lawless Musk has gotten, why it’s so important for lawmakers like Raskin to speak out, and how public resistance might have a real impact.