SEC Settles FCPA Case with Moog, Inc. for Nearly $1.7 Million

Nov 11, 2024

The SEC recently settled a significant FCPA case, with a New York manufacturer paying $1.7 million due to bribery allegations in India. Key insights reveal how Moog's Indian subsidiary misused contractor services to influence tender processes. With employees resorting to deceptive schemes and third-party agents, the podcast highlights alarming compliance failures. The discussion emphasizes the vital importance of maintaining ethics in international business dealings, especially amidst regulatory scrutiny.

Ask episode

Chapters

Transcript

Episode notes

Bribery Schemes and Corporate Compliance Failures

00:00 • 14min

The SEC notched another FCPA settlement, continuing its steady pursuit and resolution of FCPA cases. In the meantime, the Justice Department has been silent in the FCPA enforcement arena. In this episode of Corruption, Crime, and Compliance, Michael Volkov dives into the SEC’s recent FCPA settlement with Moog, a global manufacturer that faced severe bribery allegations within its Indian subsidiary. From navigating India's complex tender processes to revealing corrupt practices and hefty penalties, Michael dissects Moog's compliance failures and highlights the critical role of ethics in international business dealings.

Listen in as he discusses:

Moog, Inc. ("Moog"), a New York-based global manufacturer of motion controls systems for aerospace, defense, industrial, and medical markets, agreed to pay a civil penalty of $1.1 million and disgorge nearly $600,000 for a total of $1.7 million, to resolve FCPA charges arising out of bribes paid by its wholly owned Indian subsidiary, Moog Motion Controls Private Limited (Moog Motion Controls).
Moog India allegedly bribed officials from the South Central Railway (SCR) and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) to influence tender processes and exclude competitors. These bribes were often disguised as “contractor services.”
From 2020 to 2022, Moog employees bribed various Indian officials to win business. Also, they used a variety of schemes to make improper payments, including funneling them through third-party agents and distributors. These same Moog employees also offered cash bribes to Indian officials in an attempt to cause public tenders in India to favor Moog’s products and exclude competitors.
The case highlights significant gaps in Moog’s internal controls, including improper invoice recording, inadequate oversight of third-party agents, and a lack of compliance training.
Moog self-reported the misconduct, terminated those involved, enhanced its compliance program, and strengthened accounting controls and auditing procedures for third-party interactions.

Resources

Michael Volkov on LinkedIn | X (Twitter)

The Volkov Law Group