Fraser Myers hosts Luke Gittos, a Spiked columnist focused on politics and culture, and Michael Murphy, a Telegraph writer and documentary presenter. They dive deep into the recent farmer protests against inheritance tax policies, revealing the disconnect between rural realities and government responses. The conversation also touches on the tensions surrounding free speech, particularly in light of non-crime hate incidents. Additionally, they critique Jaguar's controversial marketing shift and the larger implications for brand loyalty.
The farmers' protests reveal significant discontent with government policies that threaten the livelihoods of tenant farmers through proposed tax changes.
Concerns over the policing of speech illustrate a widening gap between free expression rights and legislative measures restricting potentially harmful online discourse.
Deep dives
Farmers' Protests Against Inheritance Tax Reforms
Thousands of farmers protested in London against the Labour government's proposed changes to inheritance tax, particularly impacting tenant farmers who do not own their land. The government's plan to remove agricultural property relief for properties valued over £1 million could force tenants to sell land in order to pay tax bills, creating significant disruption to farming operations. Critics argue that the government misjudged the potential fallout of these reforms, which aim to generate only a modest £500 million in revenue. The emotional and practical consequences for farmers, who often have deep ties to their land, underscore a disconnect between policymakers and rural communities, leading to what many see as a misguided attack on the farming sector without justifiable economic rationale.
Concerns Over Police Investigation of Journalists
The investigation of journalist Alison Pearson for stirring up racial hatred has sparked widespread concern regarding the policing of speech and the implications of current legislation. The discussion highlights the tension between free expression and laws that allow the police broad leeway to interpret complaints about speech as actionable offenses. There seems to be a growing recognition from some political figures about the need for police to prioritize serious crimes over investigations into potentially harmful online commentary. The situation raises significant questions about free speech protections and the increasing trend of police involvement in monitoring and investigating social media activity.
Critique of European Human Rights Legislation
Recent cases highlighting the conflicts between human rights legislation and public safety, such as the inability to deport a convicted rapist due to Article 8 rights, have reignited debates about the effectiveness and implications of the European Convention on Human Rights. Critics argue that while the intention behind such rights is positive, their interpretation can lead to dangerous precedents that allow individuals to remain in the country unlawfully despite posing threats to public safety. The ongoing scrutiny of human rights laws reflects a broader dissatisfaction with how these rules are applied versus how they are enforced in other European countries. Without major political shifts toward reforming these laws, instances of perceived judicial absurdity are likely to continue, undermining public confidence in legal protections.
Fraser Myers is joined by Luke Gittos and Michael Murphy to discuss the farmers’ protests, non-crime hate incidents, the child abuser we can’t deport and Jaguar’s disastrous woke rebrand.
This episode is sponsored by Beckett’s Gin. Listeners to the show can get 20% off all spirits, including Beckett’s single-malt English whisky, here: https://beckettsgin.co.uk/spiked
Take your business to the next level with Shopify. Sign up now and get a £1-per-month trial period.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
