The Intelligence from The Economist

Veep state: the running mates debate

Oct 2, 2024
James Bennett, a Lexington columnist for The Economist, explores the recent vice-presidential debate, analyzing J.D. Vance and Tim Walz's performances and the stakes as Election Day approaches. Matthew Holhouse, a British political correspondent, dives into the disillusionment among voters regarding Brexit and the Labour Party's evolving strategies. They also discuss the paradox of Michelin stars, discussing how such accolades can create pressure and affect restaurant sustainability while maintaining high visibility. It's a lively debate on politics and gastronomy!
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Debate Impact

  • JD Vance, initially unpopular, surprised with a polished performance, effectively conveying Trump's message.
  • Despite this, the debate likely won't significantly impact the election's outcome.
ANECDOTE

January 6th Reminder

  • The debate shifted when the topic of January 6th arose.
  • This reminded viewers of Trump's influence and the current political climate.
ANECDOTE

Vance's Strategy

  • JD Vance aimed to improve his image by appearing reasonable and eloquent.
  • He presented a positive view of Trump's presidency, even bending facts.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app