Emily Baker-White, an investigative reporter at Forbes, delves into TikTok's intense legal battles as the app faces potential bans in the U.S. She discusses the clash between free speech and national security as TikTok challenges recent legislation. The conversation highlights the importance of creators in shaping political dialogue, especially with the Democratic National Committee's outreach to TikTok influencers. Emily also sheds light on the geopolitical implications of the app's future amid rising U.S.-China tensions.
TikTok's legal battle over potential divestiture highlights the conflict between national security concerns and First Amendment rights for users.
Public opinion on the TikTok ban has shifted, underscoring the platform's political influence and its role in American societal discourse.
Deep dives
Legal Stakes of the TikTok Ban
The recent legal challenges surrounding TikTok focus on the law passed by Congress that could lead to the app's ban or require its parent company, ByteDance, to divest. The deadline for any divestiture is set for January 19, coinciding with the end of the Biden administration. TikTok has countered the law, asserting that it violates the First Amendment rights of its users and that it essentially functions as a punishment against a single company, which lawmakers cannot do. As this court case unfolds, it becomes crucial to examine the implications for 170 million Americans who actively use the platform.
Public Opinion and Political Maneuvering
Public sentiment surrounding the TikTok ban has shifted considerably since its initial announcement, with less support emerging as the conversation has dwindled. TikTok's effectiveness in engaging users and mobilizing them politically has raised eyebrows, particularly after they experienced backlash for trying to prompt creators to advocate against the ban. The platform now emphasizes its role in facilitating political discourse to underscore the importance of protecting First Amendment rights. The decrease in public concern highlights the evolving nature of perceptions regarding the app and its value in American society.
Geopolitical Implications and Future Precedents
The case against TikTok bears significant geopolitical weight, as it poses questions about the intersection of national security with digital communication platforms. If the courts rule in favor of banning TikTok or enforcing a forced sale, it could set a troubling precedent for regulating foreign apps based on potential security threats. This scenario could lead to a slippery slope where similar actions are undertaken against other foreign entities, thereby complicating international relations. The implications of such a ruling extend far beyond TikTok itself, as it raises fundamental questions about the balance between national security and free speech in the digital age.
The law has been passed and signed by the president: TikTok’s parent company must sell or divest from the app. But that’s not happening without a legal fight.
Want more What Next TBD? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Evan Campbell, Patrick Fort, and Cheyna Roth.