Delve into the intriguing nature of time and divine creation. Discover a listener's challenge to the Kalam Cosmological Argument regarding God's existence outside of time. The discussion highlights the distinctions between eternal and timeless concepts. Explore the implications of these ideas on our understanding of the universe's age and the relationship between time and creation.
God's decrees are eternal and timeless, which differentiates them from simply existing throughout time to avoid equivocation.
The discussion of the Kalam argument raises the paradox of a timeless deity creating time, suggesting a hybrid model of God's existence.
Deep dives
The Nature of Eternal Decrees
The discussion revolves around the definition of eternity, particularly in the context of God's decrees. When one considers God's timeless nature, it becomes evident that His decrees are eternal in the sense of being without beginning and end. However, it is crucial to distinguish this from the concept of existing throughout time. Thus, claiming that God has eternally been making time requires precise terminology; otherwise, it leads to the fallacy of equivocation.
Challenges to the Kalam Argument
The Kalam argument is further examined through the lens of how God interacts with time, especially when considering a tensed theory of time. If God were to create time, it implies a relational change in His existence, suggesting a form of temporality. This brings up the question of how a timeless deity could bring time into being; even if such a decree is made timelessly, the act of creation may not be compatible with a lack of temporal existence. The proposed hybrid model suggests that God is timeless prior to creation but becomes temporal with the initiation of time, allowing for a finite past.