Exploring the pressure on women to use long-term chemical birth control, the podcast discusses the importance of defending the right to choose life. It highlights the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists as a supportive resource.
Women pressured into long-term birth control affecting autonomy.
Historical ties of eugenics thinking in promotion of certain contraceptives.
Deep dives
Negative Impact of Long-Term Chemical Birth Control
Chemical contraceptives are often marketed to women as a means of autonomy, but recent revelations indicate that many women have actually had their autonomy stripped away through pressure to use long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) like IUDs and implants. These methods are disproportionately promoted to young, low-income, ethnic minority, or already-mothers. Stories have emerged of doctors pushing LARCs on women whose pregnancies were deemed undesirable, reflecting a concerning trend in contraceptive practices.
Historical Context and Eugenics Thinking in Contraceptive Promotion
The promotion of chemical birth control and LARCs in certain demographics has historical ties to eugenics thinking, as fertility was seen as a problem to be solved rather than a gift to be protected. This perspective is rooted not only in the abortion movement but also in the historical push for birth control. Women are encouraged to advocate for their right to choose how they give life, as highlighted by organizations supporting pro-life obstetric and gynecological care.
1.
Examining the Pressure on Women Regarding Long-Term Chemical Birth Control