Legal expert David Lat joins Sarah to discuss recent SCOTUS decisions, including bump stock case, Lily Ledbetter, Mifepristone decision, Trump's trademark, Justice Gorsuch, NLRB, Alito's secret recording, Young Thug's court trial, predicting SCOTUS decisions, sentencing in Hunter Biden saga. They also touch on Peggy Noonan's response to Alito-gate and David Lat's 'underneath their robes'. Episode covers various Supreme Court cases, controversies, and analyses on trademarking disputes, relationships among Justices, and future of administrative law.
SCOTUS emphasizes text over intent in defining machine guns post-Las Vegas.
Barrett advocates for reasonableness over historical analysis in Trump trademark case.
Gorsuch prioritizes due process rights in dissent, advocating for procedural safeguards.
Deep dives
Supreme Court's Decision on Bump Stock Ban
A 6-3 Supreme Court decision involved the interpretation of the definition of a machine gun in the 1934 Machine Gun Act. The case centered on bump stocks after the Las Vegas shooting, where the ATF redefined machine guns. Justice Thomas's opinion focused on the text of the law, emphasizing trigger functions over human usage, while the dissent, led by Sotomayor, highlighted the statute's intent to ban rapid-firing weapons.
Trademark Restrictions and First Amendment
Justice Barrett's concurrence in the Trump trademark case challenged the substantial reliance on text history and tradition in constitutional interpretation. She emphasized the need for principled analysis beyond historical pedigrees. The case exemplified a shift towards reasonableness-based evaluation rather than rigid reliance on historical context in constitutional interpretation.
Gorsuch's Approach to Due Process Rights
In an immigration-related case, Justice Gorsuch joined the liberal justices in a dissent emphasizing due process rights. He underscored the necessity of proper notice and adherence to strict procedural safeguards, showcasing a commitment to protecting individual rights regardless of the broader ideological disposition. The dissent highlighted Gorsuch's principled stance on governmental accountability and individual rights.
Justice Jackson's Concurrence on NLRB Standard
Justice Jackson's concurrence in the podcast episode highlights an intriguing perspective on the NLRB standard and statutory framework. She emphasizes that while the four prongs for injunctions must be considered, the likelihood of success on the merits prong should be viewed through the expertise of the NLRB as mandated by Congress. This reflects a defense of the agency's prerogatives and suggests a potential shift towards a more vigorous defense of the administrative state in upcoming cases.
Young Thug Trial and Defense Lawyer's Contempt
The Young Thug trial, known for its complexity and length, sheds light on the challenges within the legal system. The trial lasting 18 months and projected to continue into 2025 serves as an indicator of potential tumult, similar to what may arise in the future Trump case. Notably, the contentious trial saw Young Thug's lead lawyer held in contempt mid-trial for objecting to an ex parte meeting, showcasing the intricacies and potential pitfalls in high-profile legal proceedings.
Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings—including Sarah’s Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here.