“My ‘infohazards small working group’ Signal Chat may have encountered minor leaks” by Linch
Apr 2, 2025
auto_awesome
In a twist of fate, a private Signal chat on infohazards faced unexpected leaks, raising alarms about security and ethics. The group reflects on the risks of discussing sensitive topics like AI safety and synthetic biology. They share the anxiety stemming from misinformation and miscommunication, spotlighting the delicate balance between transparency and confidentiality. The discussion highlights past breaches and the troubling potential of information hazards in today's digital age.
10:33
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
The unintentional leak of sensitive information within the infohazards small working group highlights significant risks associated with managing confidential discussions on critical topics.
Despite the challenges posed by accidental breaches, the group believes that transparency may foster better understanding and improvements in future communications about safety concerns.
Deep dives
Concerns Over Infohazards and Accidental Leaks
The discussion centers around the challenges of managing sensitive information within a secure chat group focused on info hazards. A recent leak, attributed to a discredited journalist, has raised alarms regarding the premature exposure of new and potentially dangerous topics, such as synthetic organisms and their impact on health and ecosystems. The accidental sharing of confidential material is particularly concerning as it may inadvertently guide malicious entities, including bioterrorists, inappropriately. Despite the aim of fostering a responsible dialogue about these critical issues, the group acknowledges that mistakes can undermine their goals.
Fallout from Confidentiality Breaches
A series of interesting but problematic confidentiality breaches has impacted the dialogue within the community regarding AI safety and bioweapons development. Instances included sharing evaluative documents meant for AI researchers, which ended up with unintended recipients, creating potential risks. One notable example involved the accidental dissemination of a sabotage manual for rebellious AIs, which culminated in the document being integrated into the training data of popular AI models, raising ethical concerns. Although there's ongoing tension and frustration over these lapses, there is an underlying hope that transparency will encourage learning and improve future communications.
1.
Concerns Over Sensitive Infohazard Leaks in a Coordination Group
Remember: There is no such thing as a pink elephant.
Recently, I was made aware that my “infohazards small working group” Signal chat, an informal coordination venue where we have frank discussions about infohazards and why it will be bad if specific hazards were leaked to the press or public, accidentally was shared with a deceitful and discredited so-called “journalist,” Kelsey Piper. She is not the first person to have been accidentally sent sensitive material from our group chat, however she is the first to have threatened to go public about the leak. Needless to say, mistakes were made.
We’re still trying to figure out the source of this compromise to our secure chat group, however we thought we should give the public a live update to get ahead of the story.
For some context the “infohazards small working group” is a casual discussion venue for the [...]
---
Outline:
(04:46) Top 10 PR Issues With the EA Movement (major)
(05:34) Accidental Filtration of Simple Sabotage Manual for Rebellious AIs (medium)
(08:25) Hidden Capabilities Evals Leaked In Advance to Bioterrorism Researchers and Leaders (minor)