Adobe Says It Won't Train AI Using Artists' Work. Creatives Aren't Convinced
Jun 20, 2024
auto_awesome
Exploring Adobe's controversial use of artists' work for AI training and the concerns raised about potential violations of intellectual property rights. The podcast debates whether Adobe can be trusted with creators' content and delves into alternative software options for artists.
Artists distrust Adobe's AI training practices due to concerns of non-consensual use and monetization.
Adobe's terms clarified, but artists remain suspicious about the company's intentions.
Deep dives
Implications of AI on Adobe's Terms of Service
Adobe recently updated its terms of service causing an outcry among users over concerns of granting unlimited access to their content for AI training, particularly its generative AI named Firefly. This controversy revealed a climate of skepticism among artists who heavily rely on Adobe for their work. Despite Adobe's clarification that the terms do not give them content ownership, artists like John Lamb remain suspicious about the company's intentions
Artists' Response to Adobe's AI Practices
Artists have expressed apprehension over Adobe's AI training practices, fearing non-consensual use and monetization of their work. Cases of generative AI models using artists' names without consent have led to legal actions, highlighting the need for stronger protections for creatives. Some artists have opted to switch to alternative platforms like Affinity and Clip Studio, while Adobe faces scrutiny over its training methods for AI models like Firefly.
1.
Debate Over Adobe's Use of Artists' Work for AI Training