Why the West picks guns over diplomacy, with Vijay Prashad
Jan 14, 2025
auto_awesome
Vijay Prashad, an Indian historian and political commentator, dives into the troubling dynamics of the global arms trade. He discusses how world leaders often act as arms dealers, impacting diplomacy and escalating conflicts. The conversation highlights the humanitarian crises fueled by military spending and calls for a shift from militarization to collaboration. Prashad reflects on historical events like Hiroshima to illustrate the ongoing struggle for sovereignty in the Global South, and advocates for grassroots activism against arms proliferation.
The arms trade's deep-rooted corruption, accounting for over 40% of global corruption, fuels militarization over diplomacy, exacerbating conflicts worldwide.
Historical patterns of imperialism reveal how resource exploitation by the Global North continues to provoke resistance and calls for sovereignty in the Global South.
Deep dives
The Corruption and Scale of the Arms Trade
The arms trade is marked by significant levels of corruption, with estimates suggesting that over 40% of global corruption occurs within this industry. Major weapons manufacturers often inflate costs when dealing with governments, allowing them to skim profits through illicit channels used for political funding or personal gain. As a result, the arms industry not only fuels war but also exacerbates diplomatic tensions, pushing nations towards militarization rather than peaceful negotiation. This cycle of corruption and militarization ultimately leads to increased conflict, undermining global security and stability.
Consequences of Military Spending on Society
Governments face a crucial choice between increasing military budgets or investing in vital infrastructure and social services, a choice that reflects broader political and economic priorities. The pressure to allocate funds towards military readiness often undermines efforts to address critical social issues, such as poverty and infrastructure decay. For instance, the assertion that NATO members should increase their defense spending serves as a prime example of shifting funds away from essential civilian needs, highlighting a dangerous trend where military priorities overshadow societal welfare. This dilemma underscores the essential question of whether a society should prioritize arms acquisition over the well-being of its citizens.
The Role of Imperialism in the Arms Trade
Historical patterns illustrate a legacy of imperialism where the Global North continues to exploit resources from the Global South to fuel the arms trade. The case of the Congolese uranium used in atomic bomb development serves as a stark reminder of how resource control often leads to violent intervention in sovereign nations. Current geopolitical tensions indicate that such dynamics persist, as countries like Niger seek sovereignty over their natural resources, challenging former colonial powers. These movements reflect ongoing resistance against exploitative practices, indicating a crucial shift towards self-determination in the face of historical injustices connected to arms production and trade.
The West may be losing control over the world’s resources but it still dominates weapons systems and information. Vijay Prashad explains why some world leaders are effectively arms dealers and how this influences diplomacy.
Credits: Maxine Betteridge-Moes (Producer, Digital Editor), Amy Hall, Bethany Rielly, Conrad Landin, Nick Dowson (Co-Editors), Paula Lacey (Editorial Assistant), Samuel Rafanell-Williams (Sound Design), Nazik Hamza (Audio Editor), Mari Fouz (Logo Design), Thomas Barlow, Impress (Media Consultant)