Liberty Lockdown FBI Agent in White RAV4? Bomb Dogs Fail, Rookie Cops "Find" Gun – Charlie Kirk Debate Goes Nuclear
14 snips
Dec 18, 2025 Join expert ballistics debaters Justin Nazaroff, co-founder of Phoenix Ammunition, and Dr. Chris Martenson from Peak Prosperity as they delve into the explosive Charlie Kirk controversy. They discuss whether a .30-06 could realistically cause fatal injuries without an exit wound, exploring physics, trajectories, and ballistic tests. The conversation heats up with skepticism around FBI involvement and rookie cops claiming to 'find' a gun. Expect gripping insights into the world of ammunition, forensic science, and the political implications of the case!
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Early Scene Irregularities Raise Doubt
- The gun and an FBI badge sighting raise major transparency questions about the investigation timeline.
- Clint Russell argues those coincidences alone justify public skepticism of the official narrative.
Widow's Phone Revealed Hidden Messages
- Clint recounts Erica Kirk initially saying she saw only texts but later discovering Signal/Telegram messages proving prior warnings.
- He uses this to question why critical device evidence wasn’t pursued or highlighted earlier.
Trajectory Makes .30-06 Implausible From Roof
- Ballistics debate centers on whether a .30-06 from the stated rooftop trajectory could hit spine and not exit.
- Chris Martenson says physics and geometry make that outcome extremely improbable from the official shooter position.