Lindsay Weinberg, "Smart University: Student Surveillance in the Digital Age" (Johns Hopkins UP, 2024)
Dec 21, 2024
auto_awesome
Lindsay Weinberg, a clinical assistant professor and director of the Tech Justice Lab at Purdue University, delves into the pervasive issue of student surveillance in higher education. She critiques how digital technologies often prioritize administrative efficiency over student welfare, leading to equity concerns. The discussion covers the ethical dilemmas of data collection and the influence of corporate interests on curriculum, while calling for collaborative efforts to reshape technology's role in education for democratic engagement.
The rise of predictive analytics in higher education can unintentionally reinforce biases and exclude certain demographics from opportunities.
Increasing surveillance through digital technologies creates a culture of mistrust among students and faculty, undermining collaborative educational environments.
Deep dives
The Concept of the Smart University
The term 'smart university' encapsulates the growing integration of digital technologies within higher education. This includes the use of predictive analytics, artificial intelligence, and data-driven governance aimed at improving student success, recruitment, and campus operations. However, the implementation of these technologies raises concerns about the underlying ideologies that shape their development and use. The book examines how these innovations can be influenced by institutional priorities, often to the detriment of both students' educational experiences and faculty autonomy.
Implications of Predictive Analytics in Recruitment
Predictive analytics have become pivotal in shaping student recruitment strategies for universities aiming to bolster their enrollment numbers. Administrators use historical data to identify and target potential students, often relying on demographic markers and online behaviors that may inadvertently reinforce biases. This reliance on data can lead to the exclusion of certain groups and loses sight of the broader structural challenges students face. Additionally, the commodification of student data for recruitment purposes highlights ethical concerns regarding privacy and fairness in the admissions process.
Surveillance and Control Within Higher Education
As universities adopt smart technologies, there is a troubling trend towards increased surveillance of both students and faculty. Data collection practices, often justified under the guise of improving educational outcomes, can lead to a culture of mistrust and control. Faculty members may find their performance scrutinized through algorithms that gauge their productivity based on quantifiable metrics, reinforcing a rigid and potentially punitive system. This increasing emphasis on surveillance ignores the need for a supportive educational environment that fosters collaboration and growth for all members of the academic community.
The Ethical Considerations of Digital Integration
The integration of digital technologies in higher education raises significant ethical concerns that need to be addressed. Issues surrounding data privacy, consent, and the potential for discrimination within the algorithms used to evaluate students and faculty are critical areas of focus. The dominance of for-profit ed tech companies further complicates these ethical implications, as their profit motives may not prioritize the educational mission of institutions. It calls for a collective effort from students, faculty, and administrators to ensure that the digital landscape is shaped in ways that uphold equity, inclusivity, and the true purpose of education.
In Smart University: Student Surveillance in the Digital Age(Johns Hopkins University Press, 2024), Lindsay Weinberg evaluates how this latest era of tech solutions and systems in our schools impacts students' abilities to access opportunities and exercise autonomy on their campuses. Using historical and textual analysis of administrative discourses, university policies, conference proceedings, grant solicitations, news reports, tech industry marketing materials, and product demonstrations, Weinberg argues that these more recent transformations are best understood as part of a longer history of universities supporting the development of technologies that reproduce racial and economic injustice on their campuses and in their communities.
Mentioned in this episode is this piece that Dr. Weinberg wrote in Inside Higher Ed:
Lindsay Weinberg is a clinical assistant professor and the Director of the Tech Justice Lab in the John Martinson Honors College at Purdue University.
Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program & Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.