Rabbi Jill Jacobs and Harvard law professor Noah Feldman discuss the importance of defining antisemitism, exploring its history, manifestations, and distinguishing legitimate criticism from anti-Semitic language. They address challenges in navigating criticisms of Israel and antisemitism at Harvard, advocating for education and constructive conversations to combat discriminatory conduct.
Legitimate criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitic, but using anti-Jewish tropes or stereotypes is.
Educating individuals about the historical roots of anti-Semitism and engaging in constructive conversations are crucial.
Deep dives
Rising Anti-Semitism Since October 7th
Since October 7th, there has been a significant increase in anti-Semitic incidents, ranging from chants advocating violence against Zionists to violent attacks on synagogue and Jewish institutions. The FBI has noted a rise in anti-Semitic activities, with examples such as synagogue attacks and vandalism cases becoming more frequent. The rise in anti-Semitism has been a concerning trend, with incidents occurring on college campuses, congressional hearings addressing the issue, and a general escalation in anti-Semitic rhetoric and violence.
Defining Anti-Semitism and Balancing Criticism of Israel
Anti-Semitism is defined as prejudice or hatred towards Jews as Jews, stemming from centuries-old stereotypes and discrimination. Legitimate criticism of Israel, such as questioning its policies or human rights record, is not considered anti-Semitic. However, anti-Semitism arises when Israel is criticized using anti-Jewish tropes or stereotypes, denying Jewish history or humanity, or equating Zionism with Jew hatred. Distinguishing between legitimate criticism of Israel and anti-Semitism requires careful consideration of language and intent.
Debates Over Legislation and Combating Anti-Semitism
Proposed legislation like the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act aims to address anti-Semitic behavior on college campuses by adopting the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism. However, concerns exist about potential infringements on free speech and the broad interpretation of the IHRA examples. Educating individuals about the historical roots of anti-Semitism and engaging in constructive conversations are viewed as essential steps to combatting anti-Semitism beyond legal measures, as laws may not effectively change underlying attitudes and beliefs.
Since October 7 there has been a lot of debate over what is and isn’t antisemitic. Rabbi Jill Jacobs and Harvard law professor Noah Feldman explain why the definition is so important.
This episode was produced by Avishay Artsy, edited by Amina Al-Sadi, fact-checked by Laura Bullard, engineered by Patrick Boyd and Andrea Kristinsdottir, and hosted by Noel King.