What About Foreign Interference In The 2024 Election?
Oct 31, 2024
auto_awesome
David Kirkpatrick, a New Yorker staff writer specializing in technology and national security, discusses the critical efforts to protect U.S. elections from foreign interference, highlighting the complex disinformation campaigns from nations like Russia and Iran. Meanwhile, jazz critic Martin Johnson reminisces about the late Benny Golson, celebrating his influential contributions to music. They touch on the emotional stress of the upcoming 2024 election and the cultural solace that jazz can provide during turbulent times.
The establishment of the Foreign Malign Influence Center marks a significant step in monitoring and countering foreign interference in U.S. elections.
The evolving tactics of foreign adversaries to spread disinformation through social media emphasize the need for increased vigilance among the intelligence community.
Deep dives
The Role of the Foreign Malign Influence Center
The Foreign Malign Influence Center has been established to track and counter foreign interference in U.S. elections, marking the first time such an entity is actively monitoring influences leading up to an election. Created in 2022, it operates within the intelligence community with the aim of informing the public about foreign interference attempts and reinforcing the integrity of the electoral process. Despite certain advancements since the tumultuous 2016 election, there are still concerns about the adequacy and transparency of the information released to the public. Critics argue that while the Center is providing more information than ever before, it still lacks sufficient specifics to effectively combat misinformation campaigns.
Foreign Disinformation Tactics Have Evolved
Foreign adversaries like Russia and Iran have adapted their tactics in order to create chaos and sow discord among American voters. Rather than relying solely on direct interactions, these entities have begun infusing disinformation into social media threads, concealing their operations behind seemingly authentic user comments. This tactical shift aims to evade detection by platforms monitoring foreign influence and allows misinformation to spread more organically among unwitting users. Consequently, these sophisticated tactics raise alarm about the potential for increased effectiveness of foreign operations during elections.
Lessons from Past Elections
The intelligence community has learned critical lessons from past election cycles, particularly with regard to the vulnerabilities exposed during the 2020 election. This includes a heightened awareness of significant moments, such as electoral vote certifications, where foreign influence could disrupt democracy. In alignment with these insights, there has been a concerted effort to monitor specific activities that could lead to unrest or violence post-election. The intelligence briefs have underscored the need for vigilance, especially given the interactions between foreign powers and their preferred candidates, which could lead to potential chaos.
Challenges in the Political Landscape
The complexities of the current political environment complicate how foreign influence is perceived and addressed. Political divisions make it difficult for the intelligence community to communicate straightforward warnings about foreign operations without them being filtered through partisan lenses. The Obama administration's hesitance to disclose full knowledge of Russian interference in 2016 set a precedent that continues to affect how information is disseminated. As foreign powers leverage this division, the risk of disinformation shaping electoral outcomes remains a pressing concern.
New Yorker journalist David Kirkpatrick says a government command hub is tasked with tracking and protecting U.S. elections from foreign adversaries who try to disrupt them by sowing discord and foment violence.
Guest jazz critic Martin Johnson remembers composer Benny Golson, who died last month at the age of 95.