Tyranny of Judges-Lawfare Explodes through Nationwide Injunctions, plus ANOTHER Pro-Hamas Radical has his Visa Revoked
whatshot 14 snips
Mar 24, 2025
This discussion reveals the surge in nationwide injunctions during Trump's administration, highlighting a departure from traditional use and raising concerns about judicial overreach. It contrasts the stark political divisions fueling these legal tactics. The Visa controversy introduces the case of a dual national whose anti-American rhetoric led to visa revocation, prompting debates on campus radicalism and national security. The episode underscores the implications of these trends on the political landscape and the challenges of ensuring judicial integrity.
33:54
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
Lawfare Against Trump
Democrats' new lawfare tactic against Trump is to sue repeatedly, exploiting left-wing activist judges.
Their goal is to obstruct his agenda through nationwide injunctions, a departure from typical legal practices.
insights INSIGHT
Unprecedented Injunctions
Nationwide injunctions against Trump's policies are unprecedentedly high, exceeding those against Bush, Obama, and Biden combined.
In just two months, Trump faced 37 such injunctions, compared to 32 during the other presidencies combined since 2001.
insights INSIGHT
History of Injunctions
Historically, injunctions were limited to specific parties in a case, not nationwide.
Changes in 1937 and 1976, along with activist judges, led to the current explosion of nationwide injunctions.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Lawfare Tactics: The discussion highlights the use of nationwide injunctions by left-wing activist judges to block President Trump's agenda. This tactic is described as unprecedented and a significant shift from previous administrations.
Statistics: The document provides statistics showing the dramatic increase in nationwide injunctions during Trump's presidency compared to previous administrations. For example, there were 37 nationwide injunctions in the first two months of Trump's presidency, compared to 32 during the entire terms of Bush, Obama, and Biden combined.
Historical Context: It explains the historical context of injunctions, noting that such widespread use is a recent development and a departure from traditional legal practices.
Pro-Hamas Radical's Visa Revocation
Case of Mommodo Tal: The document discusses the case of Mommodo Tal, a British and Gambian dual national studying at Cornell University on an F-1 student visa. Tal's visa was revoked due to his anti-American and anti-Israel statements and actions.
Statements and Actions: Tal is quoted making several inflammatory statements, including celebrating the October 7th attacks by Hamas and calling for armed resistance. His social media posts express hatred towards the U.S. and support for anti-Israel sentiments.
Legal and Political Reactions: The document details the legal actions taken against Tal, including his lawsuit to block deportation. It also mentions protests by left-wing activists supporting Tal and criticizes Democrats for not condemning his actions.
Broader Themes
Weaponization of Legal System: The podcast argues that Democrats are using the legal system to subvert democracy by targeting Trump through lawfare.
Judicial Reforms: There is a discussion on potential judicial reforms to address the issue of nationwide injunctions, including the possibility of returning to a system with three-judge district courts for constitutional challenges.
Free Speech and Anti-Semitism: The document touches on issues of free speech, particularly in the context of anti-Semitic actions on college campuses, and criticizes Democrats for their perceived double standards.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and the Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. Thanks for Listening
Verdict with Ted Cruz