David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect, shares insights on the surprising dynamics of Trump's cabinet selections. He discusses shadowy ‘czars’ who may wield significant influence bypassing traditional roles. The conversation delves into chaos as a tactic in Trump's strategy, highlighting the controversial figures nominated. Dayen emphasizes how these appointments could shift power within the administration, reflecting on the challenges and implications for policy-making, especially regarding immigration and trade.
The podcast discusses how Trump's cabinet functions mainly as symbolic positions while real power lies with White House-appointed 'czars'.
A centralization of governance under Trump may enhance his control over policy agendas, reducing bureaucratic resistance and accountability.
Deep dives
The Cabinet's Limited Role in Trump's Administration
The podcast explores the notion that cabinet members under Donald Trump's administration may primarily function as figureheads rather than true decision-makers. Observers note that key policy decisions are likely to be directed by individuals within the White House, referred to as 'czars,' rather than those appointed to cabinet positions. This structure is designed to centralize power, with czars reporting directly to the president and bypassing the traditional bureaucratic complexities of government agencies. As evidence, the podcast discusses how figures like Tom Homan and Stephen Miller, perceived as hardliners on immigration policy, are positioned to exert significant influence despite their cabinet roles.
Centralization of Power and Its Implications
The podcast highlights a strategic shift towards centralizing governmental power within the White House, which is seen as advantageous for Trump. This approach allows him to minimize bureaucratic pushback that cabinet members could mount against presidential directives, as they typically have more autonomy within their agencies. The discussion reveals that cabinet positions may be filled more for their political symbolism than for actual policy influence, allowing Trump to maintain tighter control over his agenda. This centralization could lead to a more autocratic governance style, where dissent and conflicting information are less likely to disrupt the administration's objectives.
The Influence of Non-Confirmed Advisors
The podcast also emphasizes the role of non-confirmed advisors, or czars, who significantly shape policy without the oversight of Senate confirmation. By appointing figures like Kristi Noem and Elon Musk to influential roles without the need for confirmation, Trump can swiftly push his agenda with fewer checks and balances. This lack of formal accountability could facilitate more extreme policies since these advisors are not subject to the same scrutiny as cabinet members. The implications of such a strategy raise concerns about transparency and governance as these advisors operate potentially outside the purview of public and legislative oversight.
Donald Trump’s picks for cabinet positions are causing a lot of rolling of eyes and gnashing of teeth. But even though they don’t have official titles or well-known names, the future of Trump’s agenda might lie with a group of White House-appointed “czars,” who are also being announced with less fanfare.
Guest: David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect.
Want more What Next? Join Slate Plus to unlock full, ad-free access to What Next and all your other favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the What Next show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.