Steven Shapin, "Eating and Being: A History of Ideas about Our Food and Ourselves" (U Chicago Press, 2024)
Jan 8, 2025
auto_awesome
Steven Shapin, Professor emeritus of the history of science at Harvard University, dives into the intricate relationship between food and identity. He explores how our understanding of dietetics has evolved from a morally driven craft to modern nutritional science. Shapin discusses the historical significance of food practices, questioning why academics deem them trivial, and highlights the shift from self-management to quick-fix diets. This conversation invites reflection on how societal values shape our views on nourishment and health.
The historical notion of dietetics emphasized a holistic approach to well-being, integrating food choices with lifestyle aspects like sleep and exercise.
Modern understandings of food often prioritize scientific nutritional components over the moral and cultural implications tied to eating practices.
Deep dives
The Intersection of Food and Culture
The exploration of food reveals significant cultural insights that evolve over time. The speaker emphasizes that the history of dietetics connects not only to scientific knowledge but also to societal norms and perceptions of health. By investigating the term 'dietetics,' the speaker reveals how contemporary meanings have diluted its historical significance, suggesting that a more holistic understanding of diet encompasses more than just weight loss. This shift in understanding highlights a cultural trend that often neglects the broader implications of how food choices shape identities and social relations.
Objective vs. Subjective Perspectives on Eating
The discussion contrasts objective, scientific approaches to food with subjective experiences related to taste and cultural practices. Historically, dietetics involved managing various life aspects, such as sleep, exercise, and emotional health, creating a holistic view of well-being. This knowledge has diminished in modern practices, where dietary guidelines often focus on specific nutritional components rather than overall lifestyle management. As a result, personal dimensions of eating, grounded in cultural and historical contexts, are frequently overlooked in favor of standardized nutritional science.
The Evolution of Food Morality
Modern discussions around food are frequently intertwined with moral implications, such as environmental sustainability and animal welfare. The speaker notes that while awareness of food-related morality persists, a critical aspect has faded: the ancient principle of moderation. The traditional view linked moderation with both health and morality, reflecting a balance in life choices, which contrasts sharply with contemporary extremes represented by fad diets. This shift suggests a need for a reconnection with the foundational ideas of balance and self-governance in dietary practices.
Self-Identity and Dietary Choices
Self-identity is intricately connected to food choices, shaping how individuals perceive themselves and their roles in society. Traditional dietetics emphasized personal responsibility in managing one's diet through individualized understanding, a notion less prevalent in today's expert-driven, one-size-fits-all advice. This transition reflects a broader societal tendency to defer personal agency to external authorities regarding health and nutrition. By acknowledging the historical context of dietetics, individuals can regain a sense of ownership over their dietary practices and their implications for identity.
What we eat, who we are, and the relationship between the two. Eating and Being: A History of Ideas about Our Food and Ourselves (University of Chicago Press, 2024) is a history of Western thinking about food, eating, knowledge, and ourselves. In modern thought, eating is about what is good for you, not about what is good. Eating is about health, not about virtue. Yet this has not always been the case. For a great span of the past—from antiquity through about the middle of the eighteenth century—one of the most pervasive branches of medicine was known as dietetics, prescribing not only what people should eat but also how they should order many aspects of their lives, including sleep, exercise, and emotional management. Dietetics did not distinguish between the medical and the moral, nor did it acknowledge the difference between what was good for you and what was good. Dietetics counseled moderation in all things, where moderation was counted as a virtue as well as the way to health. But during the nineteenth century, nutrition science began to replace the language of traditional dietetics with the vocabulary of proteins, fats, carbohydrates, and calories, and the medical and the moral went their separate ways. Steven Shapin shows how much depended upon that shift, and he also explores the extent to which the sensibilities of dietetics have been lost. Throughout this rich history, he evokes what it felt like to eat during another historical period and invites us to reflect on what it means to feel about food as we now do. Shapin shows how the change from dietetics to nutrition science fundamentally altered how we think about our food and its powers, our bodies, and our minds.
Steven Shapin is professor emeritus of the history of science at Harvard University.