Advisory Opinions Princeton Couldn’t Handle Us
Sep 19, 2024
The hosts dive into their controversial experience near Princeton, including an unexpected speaking ban. They discuss the impact of Trump-appointed judges on the judiciary and the shifting legal landscape. A compelling case of due process violations unfolds, highlighting the struggles of a nursing student wrongfully convicted. They tackle complex civil rights issues for prisoners and explore free speech implications in social issues, along with the contentious nature of academic expression, raising essential questions about justice and rights.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Princeton Controversy
- Sarah Isgur and David French spoke near Princeton University's campus, sparking controversy.
- The university sent a note to students stating the pair were not allowed to speak on campus.
Trump Judges' Productivity
- Trump-appointed judges show high productivity and influence based on published opinions and citations.
- This counters claims of laziness and suggests significant intellectual energy on the legal right.
Impact of Filibuster Removal
- Ending judicial filibusters incentivizes judges to write more concurrences and dissents, increasing maverickness.
- This impacts judicial selection and behavior, potentially affecting legal stability and clarity.