Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts Sneak Preview: The Supreme Court's Worst Move Since Trump Returned to Office
Jun 24, 2025
The discussion revolves around a controversial Supreme Court ruling that permits the deportation of migrants to dangerous third countries without due process. This decision raises serious concerns about human rights and legal accountability. The hosts delve into the implications of this ruling on executive power and the erosion of lower court authority. They also highlight alarming whistleblower claims regarding a Trump judicial nominee's actions to undermine court orders, adding another layer of tension to an already fraught legal landscape.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Shadow Docket Allows Dangerous Deportations
- The Supreme Court's shadow docket decision allows deporting migrants to third countries without due process or notice, risking torture and death.
- This decision undermines lower court rulings, Congressional statutes, and international conventions against torture.
Judge Murphy Upholds Due Process
- Basic due process requires migrants be given notice and a chance to object to deportation to dangerous countries.
- Judge Brian Murphy rightly blocked deportations that risk torture without such protections.
Silent Supreme Court Ruling Alarms
- The Supreme Court gave no reasons or clarity for lifting the injunction, obscuring who joined the majority and why.
- Justice Sotomayor dissented fiercely, revealing the court's opacity and the seriousness of the decision.