Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey

Ep 1232 | John Mark Comer & the Penal Substitutionary Atonement Debate

7 snips
Aug 20, 2025
The podcast dives into the controversy over John Mark Comer's rejection of penal substitutionary atonement (PSA). It explains PSA's significance to the gospel and the risks of dismissing it. The hosts draw on insights from theologians, discussing alternative interpretations of atonement and the implications for evangelical beliefs. There’s a critique on Comer's views and how they differ from traditional teachings, emphasizing the importance of maintaining foundational Christian doctrines amidst changing theological landscapes.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Comer's Endorsement Sparked The Debate

  • John Mark Comer publicly promoted a book that denies penal substitutionary atonement.
  • That endorsement sparked a wider evangelical debate about the gospel's core meaning.
INSIGHT

What Penal Substitution Means

  • Penal substitutionary atonement (PSA) teaches Jesus bore humanity's punishment to satisfy God's justice.
  • The doctrine frames Christ's death as a legal transaction applied by faith for reconciliation.
INSIGHT

Historical And Scriptural Support

  • PSA has deep historical roots from church fathers through Reformation theologians like Calvin.
  • Scriptural texts such as Isaiah 53 are cited as key prophetic support for substitutionary language.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app