David Folkenflik, NPR's media correspondent, dives into the striking defamation settlement between ABC and Donald Trump. He explores how Trump's legal maneuvers shape media narratives, revealing unprecedented concessions from ABC, including funding for a presidential library. The conversation highlights the precarious relationship between the press and public figures, along with the ethical dilemmas faced by journalists. Folkenflik also discusses Trump's ongoing battles with the media and the implications for press freedom and accountability.
The ABC settlement highlights the alarming shift in media accountability, prioritizing financial resolutions over journalistic integrity and independence.
Trump's legal strategies serve to intimidate press narratives, posing significant risks to press freedom and fostering self-censorship among journalists.
Deep dives
Legal Controversy and Settlement Insights
The ABC News defamation lawsuit centered on comments made by George Stephanopoulos during an interview with Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace, where he inaccurately claimed that a jury found Donald Trump liable for rape. This mischaracterization stemmed from a civil case involving writer E. Jean Carroll, where Trump was found liable for sexual abuse, but not rape according to New York state law. The subsequent settlement, totaling $15 million, involved ABC not only compensating Trump but also paying for his legal fees and potentially funding a presidential library, raising questions about ABC's commitment to journalistic integrity. Critics argue that this settlement reflects a troubling trend where media companies prioritize financial settlements over accountability, essentially rewarding Trump's aggressive legal tactics while silencing press coverage of his actions.
Trump's Strategy Against the Press
In the wake of the ABC settlement, Donald Trump has articulated a strategy of using litigation to intimidate and control press narratives, framing himself as a champion of accountability against what he terms a corrupt media. He has targeted multiple media organizations with lawsuits, suggesting a desire to obliterate critical reporting by portraying them as biased or deceptive. For instance, Trump has publicly discussed lawsuits against CBS for allegedly misrepresenting an interview with Kamala Harris, further signaling his intent to challenge journalistic practices he dislikes. This not only showcases Trump's aggressive posture toward media criticism but serves to deter other outlets from publishing potentially damaging content about him.
Implications for Media and Press Freedom
The implications of Trump's legal maneuvers extend beyond individual lawsuits, posing potential risks to press freedom and the accountability of public figures. With powerful media entities like ABC settling significant lawsuits, there are concerns about the chilling effect this may have on journalistic practices, leading to self-censorship among reporters wary of expensive legal challenges. Observers note that such actions from Trump and the settlements from media outlets reveal a broader trend of corporate interests overriding traditional journalistic principles, further compromising the independence and critical function of the press. As the media landscape continues to evolve in response to these pressures, the ability to hold power accountable may diminish, fundamentally altering the public's access to unbiased information.
Want more What Next? Join Slate Plus to unlock full, ad-free access to What Next and all your other favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the What Next show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.
