Dive into the playful antics of the 1999 comedy 'Dick,' where two teens unwittingly befriend Nixon amid the Watergate scandal. The hosts reflect on nostalgia for the 90s, discussing how the film represents youthful rebellion and critiques political figures with humor. They explore cannabis culture in 90s comedies and the evolving portrayal of women in media. The conversation examines the absurdity of politics, highlighting memorable performances and the film's commentary on American ideals, all while sharing personal insights and laughter.
The podcast humorously reflects on the immense pressures and responsibilities of running for U.S. President amid unpredictable electoral landscapes.
Discussion of 'Dick' highlights how the film cleverly marries historical facts with absurdity to critique political disillusionment and governance complexities.
The hosts contend that humor serves as an effective tool for political commentary, allowing audiences to engage with serious themes like Watergate more comfortably.
Deep dives
The Presidential Application Process
The podcast opens with a humorous take on the challenging path to becoming a U.S. President, including the high expectations and potential stress involved in the role. It stresses that while the application process can be difficult, the rewards of leadership are substantial. However, it also acknowledges the likelihood of failure, creating a sense of both urgency and caution about political aspirations. The idea that the ultimate employer is the American people emphasizes the responsibility that comes with presidential duties.
Election Environment and Polling Dynamics
The discussion highlights the chaotic atmosphere leading up to the upcoming election, emphasizing the plethora of yard signs and the uncertainty reflected in polling data. The unpredictability of elections, especially within swing states, serves as a reminder of the complex and often anomalous nature of voter behavior. Despite possessing strong opinions on candidates, polling outcomes are often razor-thin, underscoring that many elections come down to minute margins. This reiterates a broader point about the irrationality of American electoral processes, suggesting that personal perceptions of candidates do not always align with public sentiment.
Cultural Critique through Cinema
The podcast transitions into a discussion about the film 'Dick,' a satire that humorously portrays events surrounding the Nixon administration through the eyes of two teenage girls. It explores how the film cleverly intertwines historical facts with absurdity, ultimately using comedy to comment on political disillusionment. There is an emphasis on the nuanced way the film addresses the workings of power and how perceptions can shift based on inside knowledge, mirroring the loss of innocence experienced as the characters navigate political realities. The film’s unique perspective provokes thought about the complexities of governance and the ridiculousness that often permeates it.
The Appeal and Reception of 'Dick'
The hosts analyze the mixed reception of 'Dick' upon its release, attributing its lack of popularity to its unique comedic angle and failure to define its target audience clearly. They point out the film acted as a bridge for female narratives in political contexts, which may not have resonated with the more male-centric mainstream cinema of the time. Despite its initial underperformance, the discussion highlights the film's cleverness and contemporary relevance, as it critiques figures like Nixon while presenting the absurdity of politics through youthful naivety. This commentary invites listeners to reflect on how such stories might resonate differently today across various demographics.
The Role of Humor in Political Commentary
The podcast concludes by underlining the effectiveness of humor as a tool for political commentary, particularly in 'Dick,' where it serves to reveal deeper truths about governmental dysfunction. It notes how the film's lighthearted approach and character development allow audiences to engage with serious subjects like Watergate in an approachable manner. Through comedic storytelling, the film captures the essence of betrayal felt by citizens during political scandals. This invites further contemplation on how humor can facilitate discussions about political engagement and accountability.
Another in our series of election year chats about movies about presidents. Originally published 18th October, exclusive for Patreon subscribers of Daniel or Jack, now released for all.
By patron request, we watched and discussed 1999's delightful neo-screwball teensploitation 70s-nostalgiafest Dick, in which two teenage girls - Kirsten Dunst and Michelle Williams - accidentally find themselves befriending Richard Nixon (Dan Hedaya) and becoming entangled in Watergate. It's terribly fun.
Please consider donating to help us make the show and stay independent.
