We live in the age of boycotts. But which ones work?
May 15, 2024
auto_awesome
The podcast delves into the effectiveness of boycotts, particularly focusing on the recent boycott against a grocery chain in Canada. Topics include the history and evolution of boycotts, challenges of boycotting a widely available chain, emotional drive behind boycotts, and strategies for influencing corporate behavior through consumer advocacy.
Boycotts in the digital age often originate on social media platforms like Reddit, presenting new challenges in encouraging widespread participation.
Shareholder activism can be an effective strategy to influence corporate change by proposing resolutions at annual meetings for a direct dialogue with company leadership.
Deep dives
Origin of the Law-blas Boycott
The boycott of Law-blas originated within the Reddit community on a subreddit thread called Law-blas is out of control, resembling a grassroots movement. Historically, boycotts were often initiated by community or advocacy groups, but in the digital age, they increasingly emerge on social media platforms like Reddit. The organizers' demands include reducing grocery prices, increasing food security, and implementing specific price reduction measures.
Challenges of the Law-blas Boycott
The Law-blas boycott faces challenges due to habitual consumer behavior and the convenience of shopping at Law-blas affiliated stores. Participants are asked to avoid a wide range of products owned by Law-blas, which requires extensive research and changes in shopping habits. Additionally, the parent company of Law-blas includes various brands, making the boycott complex and challenging.
Effective Strategies for Corporate Change
Engagement through shareholder activism is suggested as an effective strategy for influencing corporate change. Shareholders can propose resolutions that are voted on at annual meetings, providing a direct dialogue with company leadership. However, such strategies may require financial commitments and time, contrasting with the low-cost appeal of boycotts. Despite the importance of addressing corporate practices, a measured perspective is encouraged to ensure the majority benefit from change.
We're in the middle of a month in which thousands of Canadians have sworn to boycott any store or product produced by Loblaw Companies Ltd. That includes an awful lot of stores and products, and would require some severe changing of habits. Which is why it probably won't work.
It seems that every week we're encouraged to boycott something, but how many of these protests actually result in change from the targeted company, any why? What should Canadians who want to encourage companies like Loblaw to change their strategies actually do to get some traction? And what should boycott organizers aim for to encourage the maximum number of people to join in?
GUEST: François Neville, Associate Professor of Strategic Management at McMaster University’s DeGroote School of Business
We love feedback at The Big Story, as well as suggestions for future episodes. You can find us: