Bulwark Takes 2: “I Found Out on Twitter”: Trump Kept Congress In The Dark on Iran Strikes
Jun 22, 2025
Jim Himes, a U.S. Representative from Connecticut and ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, joins to discuss the recent U.S. strikes on Iran. He emphasizes the constitutional issues surrounding presidential powers versus congressional authority in military actions. Himes highlights the risks to U.S. troops and the geopolitical tensions resulting from Iran's nuclear ambitions. The conversation also stresses the critical role of Congress in debating military decisions, advocating for diplomacy over unilateral military intervention.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Congressman Finds Out via Twitter
- Congressman Jim Himes learned about the U.S. strike on Iran from Twitter while relaxing at home.
- He and other top congressional members were not briefed before the attack, despite constitutional obligations.
Constitutional Role in War Decisions
- The Constitution requires Congress to authorize military actions, especially with troops in harm's way.
- This requirement exists to ensure proper debate and consideration of consequences and risks.
Good Outcome Doesn’t Override Constitution
- Popular justification that good outcomes excuse constitutional breaches is flawed and dangerous.
- The Constitution must be upheld regardless of perceived short-term successes or failures.