University of Houston professor explores the impact and types of presidential scandals throughout history, including discussion on the consequences for presidents, strategies of stonewalling, and the impact on fundraising and public perception. It also delves into the cost of opposition and the debate on presidential apologies after scandals.
01:18:37
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Presidential scandals can have varying impacts depending on the type of scandal and the president involved.
Presidents employ different strategies when faced with scandals, including stonewalling, cooperation, and appealing to local issues and public appearances.
Partisanship plays a significant role in determining the impact of scandals, with supporters being less likely to be affected by scandals that align with their partisan preferences.
Deep dives
Presidential Scandals and Public Reaction
Presidential scandals and the changing public reaction to them over time are discussed. Scandals have varying impacts depending on the type of scandal and the president involved. Scandals can mitigate their effects through stonewalling or cooperation. They tend to polarize people based on their partisan affiliations. Scandals generally have a short-lived impact and do not significantly affect legislative skill. The public's acceptance of scandals has increased with growing partisanship, resulting in less accountability. Scandals in modern politics often have limited consequences and quickly fade from public interest.
Presidents' Strategies in Scandals
When confronted with scandals, presidents adopt different strategies based on their involvement. Stonewalling, evasion, and blame deflection are common approaches to limit the release of damaging information. Presidents tend to cooperate more when they are not directly implicated in the scandal. Scandals can trigger additional hearings and reviews to investigate further wrongdoing. Presidents focus on local issues and public appearances to repair their image after a scandal. State of the Union speeches often emphasize economic and social welfare matters. Scandals can have significant impacts on legislative support and party unity, particularly for Republican presidents.
Scandal Consequences and Factors Influencing Impact
The consequences of scandals can vary widely, including reassertion of congressional power, media scrutiny, tougher ethics laws, or no significant consequences. Scandals' effects may be limited due to partisan divisions and the public's acceptance of certain behaviors. Scandals tend to be short-lived in public attention. Partisanship and ideological alignment can influence how scandals impact support. Scandals have shorter shelf lives and are less impactful on policy decisions than previously believed. Political polarization and schadenfreude contribute to the limited consequences of scandals.
Factors Influencing Scandal Impact
Partisanship plays a significant role in determining the impact of scandals. Scandals are less likely to have consequences when they align with individuals' partisan preferences. For supporters, scandals do not diminish their support if the candidate's ideology is perceived as favoring their interests, even if it harms the opposing party's supporters. Scandals generally have a short-term impact but can lead to increased polarization. The public's acceptance of scandals and their limited duration contribute to the relatively minor consequences of scandals in contemporary politics.
Scandals in the Modern Era: The Influence of Partisanship and Media Ecosystems
Scandals have become less impactful in the modern era due to various factors. Partisanship plays a significant role, as individuals tend to support or oppose a president based on their political affiliation, regardless of the veracity or importance of the scandalous information. The influence of media ecosystems further exacerbates this issue, as people consume news from sources that align with their political views. Lower trust in the media, particularly among conservatives, also contributes to the difficulty of reaching a nonpartisan consensus on what constitutes a scandal. Nationalized politics and the decline in focus on local connections of politicians further magnify the impact of scandals on a large scale. Overall, these factors limit the accountability and consequences that scandals should have in a functioning democracy.
Navigating Scandals: Strategies for Presidents and the Impact on Accountability
Presidents have developed strategies to handle scandals and reduce their impact. These strategies include rallying their base for support, getting the truth out early, ensuring good legal representation, implementing internal damage control measures, maintaining a focus on their presidential duties, and limiting the duration of the scandal's news cycle. Conversely, numerous mistakes have been made by presidents in handling scandals, such as attempting to change the subject, becoming defensive or indignant, and engaging in cover-ups. Scandals still matter for accountability within the political system, and the ability of scandals to affect public perception and elections demonstrates the need for greater transparency and public engagement in holding politicians responsible for their actions.
University of Houston political science professor Brandon Rottinghaus discussed presidential scandals and how public reaction to them has changed over time.
