Michael Stephens, an associate fellow at RUSI, delves into the implications of Trump's recent controversial Gaza plan, which threatens to displace millions. He discusses the backlash from various countries and explores how this decision reshapes international relations. The conversation also critiques Keir Starmer’s approach to foreign policy, particularly regarding the Chagos deal, raising questions about what 'progressive realism' truly means. Navigating through geopolitical tensions, the talk emphasizes the necessity for Britain to adapt to a rapidly changing global landscape.
Trump's controversial peace plan for Gaza raises significant questions about practicality and the normalization of previously taboo discussions on Palestinian transfer.
Keir Starmer faces internal pressure within the Labour Party to address Trump's remarks while navigating the complexities of international law and domestic politics.
Deep dives
Donald Trump's Unique Proposal for Gaza
Donald Trump's peace plan for Gaza presents an unconventional approach that involves relocating approximately 1.8 million Palestinians and transforming the region into a prosperous enclave reminiscent of Macau or Dubai. Despite the grand vision, practicality remains in question, as Trump has not detailed how this ambitious reconstruction, estimated to require over $50 billion, will be accomplished. His comments have sparked reactions from countries in the Middle East, with many rejecting the idea of resettling Palestinians. This proposal marks a notable shift in discourse, normalizing discussions around Palestinian transfer that previously would have been considered off-limits.
UK Government's Position on Trump's Policies
The UK government appears somewhat relieved in its dealings with Donald Trump as it currently lacks a significant trade deficit with the U.S., allowing it to navigate potential tensions with more leeway. However, there is emerging pressure within the Labour Party for leader Keir Starmer to take a firmer stance against Trump's controversial remarks on Gaza, as party members fear alienation of Muslim voters and the potential fallout of not addressing these concerns directly. This tension highlights the broader challenge facing the government in balancing domestic political considerations with maintaining diplomatic relationships. As Labour grapples with its response, the Chagos Islands deal emerges as a potential point of friction, complicating Starmer's position with both his party and the international community.
Uncertainty Over Progressive Realism
The concept of progressive realism, as discussed by UK politicians, has not clearly defined its core tenets or the practical implications within the current geopolitical landscape influenced by the Trump administration. Critics argue that while there is a commitment to European security and NATO, the strategy lacks detail on establishing new alliances or the role of the Commonwealth. The rapid changes in international relations, particularly with the U.S.'s fluctuating policies, pose considerable challenges for the UK government to maintain a coherent foreign strategy. This environment necessitates a reevaluation of what Britain seeks to achieve globally and what values it wishes to uphold amid shifting dynamics.
Trump has blown the Overton window wide open. In a press conference yesterday alongside Benjamin Netanyahu, the US president outlined his intention to ‘take over the Gaza Strip’, displacing 1.8 million Palestinians in the process. His plan – if you can call it that – is to build ‘the Riviera of the Middle East’. Many of the countries Trump has earmarked to resettle displaced Gazans have already condemned the takeover. How will the international community respond?
Elsewhere, Keir Starmer seems more motivated by a desire to observe the rule of international law than his buddy across the pond. The Chagos deal seems set to be completed in the ‘coming weeks’. However, the new Mauritian prime minister, Navin Ramgoolam, claimed yesterday that Starmer cut a deal – in the presence, rather curiously, of his Attorney General, Lord Hermer – that would effectively double the £9 billion first offered to the country to take back the archipelago. Why are they pressing ahead with this deal? And, seven months into this government, are we any closer to discovering what ‘progressive realism’ actually is?
James Heale speaks to Katy Balls and Michael Stephens, associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI).
Produced by Oscar Edmondson.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode