Edmund and Benjamin go beyond Berlin's positive/negative liberty, exploring republicans' perspectives, liberty's relationship to 'freedom', and the reasons for its evolving emphasis over time. They discuss the dynamics of the individual-state relationship, the use of fantasies as escapism, mediating organizations, the desire for localization and opposition to big companies, Aristotle's distinction between virtuous/unvirtuous constitutions, and the importance of choosing our own ends based on what is right and good.
Negative liberty is the absence of constraints, while positive liberty is the ability to actively choose and pursue goals.
The state and the market can limit individual liberty, with the state as a potential threat and the market framing liberty as economic freedom.
The public-private distinction can maintain an illusion of personal freedom, with social structures and norms exerting significant influence even in supposedly private areas.
Deep dives
The Concept of Liberty: Positive vs Negative
The podcast episode explores the concept of liberty by discussing the distinction between positive liberty and negative liberty. Negative liberty refers to the absence of constraints and the freedom from being dependent on something unwanted. On the other hand, positive liberty focuses on the ability to actively choose and pursue something desired. The episode highlights how negative liberty is often associated with being independent and not constrained by authority, while positive liberty is seen as the capacity to do something and is equated with power. The discussion also mentions that modern societies tend to value liberty more than ancient societies, where the concept of liberty was less prominent.
The Role of the State and the Market
The podcast delves into the role of the state and the market in relation to concepts of liberty. It explains that as states and markets have become more powerful in modern times, the ability for individuals to truly experience participatory freedom has diminished. The episode discusses how the state, as an external force, can be seen as a potential threat to individual liberty. It examines the idea that the modern state denies its own existence in order to justify its power and control over citizens. Additionally, the episode explores how the market economy, driven by profit, has shaped contemporary conceptions of liberty, often framing it as freedom to engage in economic activities.
The Public-Private Distinction and Illusions of Liberty
The podcast episode addresses the public-private distinction and its impact on perceptions of liberty. It suggests that the distinction between the public and private spheres is often used to maintain the illusion of personal freedom. The episode discusses how social structures and norms, even in supposedly private areas, can still exert significant influence and restrict individual agency. It highlights the feminist movement's critique of the public-private distinction, arguing that certain social expectations and roles, such as those related to gender, can limit individual freedom. The episode concludes by suggesting that the concept of liberty has become a way of sustaining an illusion of individual agency in a complex, powerful, and interconnected social world.
The Role of Consumption and Voting in Identity Formation
The episode discusses the role of consumption and voting in shaping individuals' identities. It suggests that people often identify more with their buying habits or jobs, which they engage in regularly, compared to the parties they vote for, which may only happen every few years. The speaker highlights the influence of consumer power, which is tied to individuals' financial resources, versus voting power, which is based on one person, one vote. The emergence of big money in politics and its impact on people's perception of their influence is also explored.
Creating a Sense of Identity through Collective Rights
The podcast presents the idea that to create a sense of identity within modern large-scale institutions like the state and the market, people can unite around a larger basket of citizenship rights. These rights, associated with being a citizen, can include protections against domination and exploitation, as well as entitlements to resources like housing, energy, and leisure time. By expanding and protecting these rights, individuals can feel a meaningful connection to the state and exercise their freedom within the societal structures. The concept of thin participation, where individuals are part of a collective body pursuing and expanding these rights, is proposed as an alternative to individual agency within institutions that have become impersonal and distant.
Edmund and Benjamin discuss different conceptions of liberty. They go beyond Isaiah Berlin's positive/negative distinction, examining republicans ways of thinking about the concept, its relationship to 'freedom', and some of the reasons why the emphasis has shifted over the centuries.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode