On Evidentialism, Part 5: Bad analogies

In this last video about evidentialism and reformed epistemology, I tackle some analogies that have been made, such as knowing that you are innocent of a crime when the forensic evidence is against you. I point out important disanalogies between the alleged defeater-defeating witness of the Holy Spirit and these cases. RE folks cannot simultaneously say that the IWHS is self-authenticating and defeater-defeating while also claiming that it's epistemologically similar to more ordinary types of events.  Here is the transcript of the talk by Dr. Craig that I read from: https://www.reasonablefaith.org/videos/lectures/epistemic-justification-of-christian-faith-for-talbot-school-of-theology