Blog & Mablog Smashmouth Compromise?
Jun 2, 2025
A deep dive into the debate on abolitionism versus incrementalism reveals fascinating insights on the pro-life movement. The discussion navigates moral trade-offs and the implications of compromises in abortion legislation through a Christian ethical lens. A thought-provoking exploration of divorce in the Bible highlights the distinction between divine permission and endorsement. Additionally, ancient justice systems are scrutinized, emphasizing the suffering of innocents and the importance of safeguarding mechanisms like cities of refuge.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Trade-offs in Pro-Life Action
- Trade-offs in pro-life responses are unavoidable and must be judged by God's law.
- Some compromises are lawful while others represent sinful moral failures.
Where To Draw The Line
- Both abolitionists and incrementalists accept trade-offs but differ where they draw the line.
- The question arises why some compromises stop at a certain point and not go further or fully radical.
Two Governors, One Law, Different Outcomes
- Two governors signing identical heartbeat abortion bills show vastly different moral outcomes based on context.
- One introduces murder, the other saves many unborn by incremental progress.