The NPR Politics Podcast Absolute Immunity?
Apr 25, 2024
The Supreme Court hears arguments on whether a former president can claim absolute immunity from prosecution. The discussion dives into the legal complexities of distinguishing official duties from private conduct. It raises crucial questions about presidential powers and the implications for future governance. Insights into local journalism emphasize the importance of public media in democracy, alongside a deep dive into the legal scrutiny faced by presidential actions, especially regarding election interference.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Presidential Immunity Arguments
- The Supreme Court heard arguments on whether a US president has immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken in office.
- Several justices considered the precedent this would set for future presidents.
Justices' Concerns
- Justices seemed concerned about the precedent, implications for the presidency, and potential weakening of the office.
- Some justices seemed receptive to Trump's lawyer, John Sauer.
Sauer's Argument
- Trump's lawyer, John Sauer, argued that prosecuting a former president would be a "mortal threat" to the presidency.
- Sauer also suggested some statutes might apply to others but not the president.