Embracing freedom involves taking responsibility, creating meaningful connections, and making self-chosen decisions.
Escaping from freedom takes different forms such as authoritarianism, destructiveness, and automaton conformity, sacrificing individuality and retreating from external constraints.
Deep dives
Embracing Freedom versus Escaping from Freedom
Eric Fram discusses the concept of embracing freedom versus escaping from freedom. He argues that while negative freedom, the absence of external constraints, has been fought for and achieved, people often struggle with embracing positive freedom, which involves self-chosen connections and actions. Embracing freedom requires individuals to take responsibility for their decisions and create meaningful connections through love and productive work. On the other hand, escaping from freedom takes different forms such as authoritarianism, destructiveness, and automaton conformity, which involve retreating back to external constraints and sacrificing individuality.
Authoritarianism as Escape from Freedom
One way people escape from freedom is through authoritarianism. Fram explains that both the actual authoritarian leaders and their supporters exhibit sadistic and masochistic tendencies. They seek power, submit to authority, and limit the freedom of others. By being part of an authoritarian power structure, they sacrifice their individuality and create chains for themselves and others.
Destructiveness and Automaton Conformity as Escapes from Freedom
Fram also highlights destructiveness and automaton conformity as ways people escape from freedom. Destructive individuals seek control and significance by destroying life, while conformists blend into the crowd and adopt the beliefs and values of others without critical thinking. Both strategies result in the loss of individuality and a retreat from the complexities of freedom.