Stephen Woodhouse, Director Afry Management Consulting, and Phil Hewitt, Director, Montel EnAppSys, discuss the pros and cons of locational prices in the UK electricity market, including the benefits and challenges of transitioning to a zonal market. They explore the implications of a centralized dispatch system, the comparison to European intraday markets, and the ongoing debate between nodal and zonal pricing. They also address the potential impact on existing contracts with a Contract for Difference (CFD).
Locational pricing can incentivize renewable generation to match demand and facilitate the flow of excess generation between zones.
Zonal pricing offers clearer price signals, encourages efficient transmission investments, and allows for the continuation of intraday markets.
Deep dives
The Benefits of Locational Pricing: Driving Renewable Generation and Encouraging Transmission Investment
Locational pricing, whether nodal or zonal, can have several benefits. In the UK, where there is a concentration of renewable generation in the north and high demand in the south, a locational pricing system could incentivize renewable generation to match demand. This would mitigate the need to turn down renewable generation due to transmission constraints and replace it with more expensive fossil generation. Additionally, locational pricing provides price signals that encourage the construction of transmission infrastructure between zones, facilitating the flow of excess generation from areas with surplus to those with deficits.
The Concerns with Nodal Pricing
While nodal pricing may seem appealing, it has limitations in a decentralized and rapidly decarbonizing energy landscape. Modeling the complex interactions between numerous nodes and assets becomes increasingly challenging. Furthermore, nodal pricing would require central dispatch, eliminating the flexibility provided by intraday markets and placing the responsibility solely on the system operator. Additionally, nodal pricing introduces risks and uncertainties for investors, making it less attractive for the timely deployment of generation assets.
The Potential of Zonal Pricing as a Compromise
Zonal pricing, on the other hand, offers a more feasible and less disruptive alternative. By grouping regions into zones, zonal pricing provides clearer price signals and incentives to connect cables between zones. This would help address congestion issues and encourage more efficient transmission investments. Additionally, a zonal approach allows for the continuation of intraday markets and provides a level of predictability that enables wise investment decisions. However, careful consideration must be given to the risks and trading mechanisms to avoid deterring investment.
The UK is reviewing a shift in how it prices electricity from a single wholesale market, with two locational alternatives under consideration: nodal or zonal. This week’s pod addresses the pros and cons of locational prices and whether they will help or hinder the UK’s quest for net-zero emissions.
Host: Snjólfur Richard Sverrisson, Editor-in-Chief, Montel
Guests: Stephen Woodhouse, Director Afry Management Consulting and Phil Hewitt, Director, Montel EnAppSys.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode