Gregg Carlstrom, the Middle East correspondent for The Economist, shares insights on the seismic changes in Syria following the decline of Bashar al-Assad's regime. He discusses the emotional aftermath as citizens celebrate amidst a backdrop of chaos and uncertainty. The conversation also covers the evolution of the rebel group HTS and the complex challenges of establishing governance in post-Assad Syria. Additionally, Carlstrom analyzes the shifting geopolitical landscape, including the potential roles of Turkey and Iran in this new era.
The sudden collapse of the Assad regime marks a pivotal shift in power dynamics within Syria, leading to widespread celebrations among citizens but raising concerns about governance under rebel leadership.
The outcome of the Syrian conflict enhances Turkey's influence in the region while significantly reducing Iran's presence, indicating a shift in regional alliances and potential instability.
Deep dives
Rapid Fall of the Assad Regime
The Assad regime in Syria collapsed unexpectedly within a matter of days, following a prolonged civil war that lasted over a decade. Rebel forces, particularly the group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), launched a surprise offensive on November 27, quickly overwhelming regime troops who had abandoned their posts. This swift military success culminated in mass celebrations in Damascus, where citizens tore down statues of Assad and rejoiced at the end of an era characterized by oppression and brutality. The once seemingly unassailable regime fell apart as its soldiers melted away, leaving behind uniforms on the streets, symbolizing the sudden shift of power in the country.
The Role of HTS and Leadership Challenges
HTS, an Islamist group that has transitioned from its al-Qaeda affiliations to a more moderate stance, now finds itself in control of the government structure in Syria. While HTS established a relatively effective administration in Idlib, it faces skepticism regarding its ability to govern effectively across the more complex national landscape. The group's leader, Abu Mohammed al-Julani, carries a controversial past and a significant global terrorist designation, which raises concerns about whether he can navigate the challenges of governance and maintain popular support. As Syrians react with mixed emotions of hope and skepticism, the future of HTS's leadership remains uncertain in this new era post-Assad.
Regional Implications and New Power Dynamics
The fall of the Assad regime has shifted the balance of power in the Middle East, benefitting Turkey while diminishing Iran's influence in Syria. Turkey's support for rebel groups positions it favorably in a post-Assad landscape, as it seeks to mitigate the Kurdish presence along its border. Conversely, Iran has lost a critical ally in Assad, leading to concerns about its diminished role in regional dynamics and its ability to support groups like Hezbollah. As Israel responds with aggressive military actions aimed at securing its interests amidst this upheaval, the region's future remains fraught with competing interests and potential instability.
This week, on the streets of Damascus, there were signs of an army in retreat – tanks abandoned and Syrian army uniforms scattered on the roads where soldiers had torn them off.
It reflected the speed at which rebel forces had taken over Syria, with Bashar al-Assad’s brutal reign finally coming to an end after 13 years of civil war.
As celebrations spread across the nation, the Syrian people face the task of rebuilding a country now in the hands of rebel groups.
Today, Middle East correspondent for The Economist Gregg Carlstrom on Syria’s path forward and the implications for an increasingly unstable region.