

When killing is "necessary"
Aug 23, 2019
Anita Chabrier, a legislation reporter for the LA Times, delves into California's groundbreaking law on police use of deadly force. She discusses the challenges of reform amid strong opposition from law enforcement and the role of community activism. Chabrier also explores the evolving definition of 'necessary' in assessing officer actions, emphasizing a focus on de-escalation. The conversation touches on the broader implications for police accountability and the impact of tragic incidents on legislation, highlighting the ongoing fight for justice.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Stephon Clark Shooting
- The shooting of Stephon Clark in Sacramento, California, in March 2018, fueled momentum for police reform.
- Police mistook Clark's cell phone for a weapon and shot him in his grandmother's backyard after a 911 call about vandalism.
Shift in Political Power
- The law enforcement lobby in California has historically held significant power, often blocking legislation they opposed.
- This time was different due to strong community support and new leadership willing to challenge the status quo.
The Shane Hayes Case
- In 2006, Shane Hayes, a mentally ill man, was killed by police in San Diego after they entered his home following a call about his suicidal behavior.
- This case led to a change in California law, expanding the timeline considered when evaluating an officer's use of force.