The Megyn Kelly Show BREAKING: Fani Willis Can Stay, But Nathan Wade Has to Go, with Alan Dershowitz, Dave Aronberg, Mike Davis, Phil Holloway, and Andy McCarthy | Ep. 747
Mar 15, 2024
Alan Dershowitz, Harvard Law professor emeritus and author of "Get Trump," joins legal experts including Andy McCarthy and Dave Aronberg to dissect Judge Scott McAfee's critical ruling on Fani Willis's disqualification. They discuss the implications of allowing Willis to remain while dismissing Nathan Wade, exploring how this might favor Trump. The panel debates allegations of misconduct, the integrity of prosecutorial conduct, and potential grounds for appeal, highlighting the strained relationship between legal ethics and political dynamics in high-profile cases.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Inconsistent Ruling
- Judge McAfee's ruling in Fani Willis' disqualification case is illogical and doesn't address the core issue of corruption.
- The decision to remove Nathan Wade but keep Willis over the same conflict makes no sense.
Appeal the Ruling
- Appeal the ruling due to the judge's misapplication of legal standards and failure to address the conflict of interest.
- Highlight the perjury committed by Willis regarding her relationship and financial dealings.
Misapplied Standard
- The judge wrongly focused on Willis's motivation for the indictment instead of the existing conflict of interest.
- He downplayed evidence of financial benefits and accepted Willis's uncorroborated testimony about reimbursements.
